Dear All
One of the ideas that I have for reform of
Holyrood is a Justice 3 Committee.
The purpose of the Committee would be to
review law passed by the Scottish Parliament and existing law in Scotland.
The Committee would make recommendations
for law to be repealed or if needed ‘fixed’.
No one from Justice 1 or 2 would be
eligible to sit on Justice 3 in order to widen the expertise in the Parliament.
The utterly dreadful Offensive Behaviour at
Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act is a law that needs
repealed as bad law. The law came into force because the SNP did a knee jerk reaction
to an incident involving Ally McCoist and Neil Lennon at a Rangers & Celtic
football match.
This led to Alex Salmond rushing a bill
through Parliament which was unfit for purpose and seems to target Celtic fans.
Now the Labour Party says that it will
scrap the controversial law brought in to stamp out religious sectarian abuse
at football matches.
However, there is scope for a wider reform
process, rather than reacting to a specific bill as being unsuitable.
Deputy leader Anas Sarwar revealed plans to
repeal the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications
(Scotland) Act if it wins the next Holyrood election in 2016.
Although there is a campaign against the
bill run by the Celtic Trust to use by-elections as a protest, that campaign
has been a slightly hit and miss affair in how it operated. At its heart, this
is a civil rights matter regarding law but it so happens it affects Celtic
fans. Their campaign needed to have wider appeal right across the spectrum of
football.
I have previously blogged that this law
enacted by the SNP is bad law and the chickens are now coming home to roost to
the closed minded nationalists.
The Bill gained Royal Assent in January
2012 and has been a disaster not just legally but politically, the SNP tried
unsuccessfully to rope other parties into their folly without success, this was
one shit sandwich they didn’t want to bite into, and who can blame them.
Although Celtic Football Club has called
for a review of the law, saying there was "already sufficient evidence of
the Act's unhelpfulness and negative impacts" to justify it, the SNP won’t
budge.
Community Safety Minister Roseanna
Cunningham told a Holyrood committee at the time that holding an early review
would be "nonsensical".
She has since gone on to post someone’s
personal details on twitter which attracted considerable flak, patently her
judgment is warped. Cunningham isn’t a leader, she is the led, when this tripe
sailed through Holyrood; her mouth was firmly shut.
Good team player?
No, just a schemer going along with the
flow, little better than cannon fodder!
When the Act was brought in, the Scottish
Government agreed to review its operations after two full football seasons and
to report back to Parliament one year later because they couldn’t get any
support and wanted to leave a back door open to hedge their bets politically.
This dreadful legislation gave police and
prosecutors powers to tackle sectarian songs and abuse at and around football
matches.
But it is too blunt an instrument, as well
as the interactions at matches; threats posted on the internet or through the
mail have been flung in thus creating two distinct offences that are punishable
with a range of penalties up to a maximum of five years in prison and an
unlimited fine.
Labour MP Anas Sarwar said:
"The Offensive Behaviour at Football
Act is not fit for purpose. It has proved to be ineffective and unpopular, not
least because sectarianism runs far beyond our touchlines and our
terraces."
Law by its definition doesn’t have to be
popular, it has to be just and legally correct, the OBF act doesn’t fit that
criteria.
Sarwar said Labour would tackle
sectarianism with "renewed focus", concentrating on "education
and prevention, not politics".
Obviously a dig at Alex Salmond doing knee
jerk politics, however, he did say he would ensure "the police get the
support they need and the well-meaning majority of football fans are
respected".
The Offensive Behaviour at Football and
Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act is bad law and has no place on the
statute books of Scotland.
That being said, we need a Justice 3
Committee to do a wider review of law in Scotland, there could even be a
mechanism that allows the public to petition the Committee to look at specific
laws.
Although Celtic fans have been pretty much
to the fore on this one, this legislation affects all football fans; the Celtic
Trust would have been more successful if it had taken a wider approach in rallying
support.
Their business is football not political campaigning.
Will this be a huge vote winner for Labour?
Probably not unless they can widen it
beyond fitba!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow
University
2 comments:
Sarwar is quite correct.
Secteraniism is rife outwith football circles. Cunningham should visit any home of either side of the really bitter divide.
Some kids are steeped in it, able to sing a secterarian song better than a nursery rhyme. Yet this law targets football fans specifically. Like the other attempts at reforming scots laws it should be binned.
The Scottish Government are real amateurs.
really bad law seen by many as anti Catholic in nature.
Post a Comment