Monday, March 6, 2017

Sweden on the brink: Swedish Minister Ylva Johansson forced to publicly apologise for falsely claiming the number of sex attacks in the country is decreasing, Malmo 'the rape capital of Europe', how long before Swedes decide that armed conflict is the solution to the Swedish Question?

























Dear All

When people elected politicians it is only right and natural that we expect them to live up to the high standards that political office places upon them. If they fail to do so they need to be removed.

Sweden was a homogeneous country before 1975 then politicians decided without a vote to turn Sweden into a multicultural country. The results of that failed experiment are shocking as there has been a real human cost.

Violent crime has increased by 300%.

But the real statistic which will get you to sit up and take notice is that rape has increased in Sweden. In 1975, 421 rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620.

That is an increase of 1,472%.

Malmo in Sweden has been dubbed the 'rape capital of Europe', parts of the area are considered a no go area, this is one of the 55 areas in Sweden where people fear for their safety by attacks from migrants.

Having placed people in danger, the political elite aided by the media have tried to cover up or explain away the crisis in Sweden rather than tackling the crime wave they have brought upon themselves.

Here are some of the explanations used by politicians and the media to ‘explain’ rape culture in Sweden:

Swedes have become more prone to report crime.
The law has been changed so that more sexual offences are now classed as rape.
Swedish men cannot handle increased equality between the sexes and react with violence against women (perhaps the most fanciful excuse).

Not all politicians are as dumbstruck as the political elite in Sweden, Michael Hess, a local politician from Sweden Democrat Party said:

"When will you journalists realize that it is deeply rooted in Islam's culture to rape and brutalize women who refuse to comply with Islamic teachings. There is a strong connection between rapes in Sweden and the number of immigrants from MENA-countries [Middle East and North Africa]."

Clearly Michael Hess has a view on who is doing the majority of rapes in Sweden, he is effectively saying migrants. What is more remarkable is that having made his statement Michael Hess was charged with "denigration of ethnic groups" [hets mot folkgrupp], a crime in Sweden.

In May last year, he was handed a suspended jail sentence and a fine, the suspension was due to the fact that he had no prior convictions. The verdict has been appealed to a higher court. It is becoming a crime to exercise free speech, either what Hess says is true or it is false, if it is true and being covered up, then the State has broken down to such a degree that justice has been abandoned, when things like this happen, the country is ripe for civil war.

At some stage, Swedish people will rise up against their rulers, although migrants are responsible for the increase in violent crimes and rapes, people would just be fighting against them; they will start to target politicians. By enlarge your average politician can walk about freely, we have all seen this, but what happens when an angry public decides they are fair game to be shot?

What makes the Hess interesting is this:

"The Court [Tingsrätten] notes that the question of whether or not Michael Hess's pronouncement is true, or appeared to be true to Michael Hess, has no bearing on the case. Michael Hess's statement must be judged based on its timing and context. ... At the time of the offense, Michael Hess referred neither to established research nor to Islamic sources. It was only in connection with his indictment that Michael Hess tried to find support in research and religious writings. The Court therefore notes that Michael Hess's pronouncement was obviously not a part of any reasoned [saklig] or trustworthy [vederhäftig] discussion. Michael Hess's pronouncement must therefore be viewed as an expression of disdain for immigrants with an Islamic faith."

A Court deciding that regardless the truth can be suppressed and speaking it is a crime because the political elite judge it so. When things like this happens so ends free speech and so dies democracy rather painfully, the Swedes need their Donald Trump.

To attempt to shore up the web of lies and deceit, a Swedish minister called Ylva Johansson has gone on the record insisted the number of rapes was 'going down and going down' in Sweden.

This is of course a lie.

Having attempted to lie to the people of Sweden; the Swedish minister was forced to apologise, her apology is meaningless; she is unfit for public office and has no business being a Minister. There has only been one research report on immigrant crime done in 2006 by Ann-Christine Hjelm from Karlstads University.

It emerged that in 2002, 85% of those sentenced to at least two years in prison for rape in Svea Hovrätt, a court of appeals, were foreign born or second-generation immigrants

A 1996 report by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention reached the conclusion that immigrants from North Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia) were 23 times as likely to commit rape as Swedish men.

So, what is it that Ylva Johansson does as a Minister in Sweden?

Johansson is apparently what is called the Integration Minister; it appears that she isn’t doing a good job, as rapes are on the rise from the migrant community. The new trend in Sweden is gang rape; this was virtually unknown before in Swedish criminal history. One of the worst cases occurred in 2012, when a 30-year old woman was raped by eight men in a housing project for asylum seekers. The woman was an acquaintance of a man from Afghanistan who had lived in Sweden for a number of years. He took her to a refugee housing project and left her defenseless. During the night, she was raped repeatedly by the asylum seekers and then by her "friend". This according to Sweden's public prosecutor was "the worst crime of rape in Swedish criminal history."

Because politicians have close links with the media, the news agenda can be manipulated to conceal the truth which those doing it then to cite the ‘good of the people’ as if the truth is something to be feared. Here is an example how the media in Sweden distorted and misrepresented facts.

All major Swedish media reported on a brutal gang rape on board the Finnish Ferry Amorella, running between Stockholm and Åbo in Finland. Big headlines told the readers that the perpetrators were Swedish:

"Several Swedish Men Suspected of Rape on the Finland Ferry" (Dagens Nyheter).
"Six Swedish Men Raped Woman in Cabin" (Aftonbladet).
"Six Swedes Arrested for Rape on Ferry" (Expressen).
"Eight Swedes Suspected of Rape on Ferry" (TT – the Swedish News Agency).

Having read this, you would think that the gang rape carried out by white men, you think Swedish; you think blue eyed and blonde. The truth was that the gang rape wasn’t carried out by Swedes, no the real criminals were migrants, seven of the eight suspects were Somalis and one was Iraqi.

None of them had Swedish citizenship.

When an internet radio station Granskning Sverige called the mainstream newspapers Aftonbladet and Expressen to ask why they had described the perpetrators as "Swedish men" when they were actually Somalis, they told, ‘that is irrelevant’. And to show what snowflakes these people were, they were offended that anyone had the nerve to tackle them on what effectively amounts to lying and deception.

Finally, I believe in telling the truth, and came across someone who shares the same view that the truth must be told.


Freedom of speech is under attack, and we must fight always to secure it from people who are the real fascists who seek to silence us, people have been effectively brainwashed into being sheep and as society cross Europe starts to fragment and collapse, we should remember to not lose sight of who our real enemies are.

I can see a time, where people will not give it a second thought to kill politicians in Europe, a return to the 1930’s. In the class series, a World at War, there is an interview where someone talked about how the German State had used murder as a political tool, in places like Malmo in Sweden; the Swedish people might think that killing migrants and politicians is a viable solution.

Yours sincerely

George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University

2 comments:

Al C said...

Appalling. People can be allowed to emigrate and move to countries, refugees can be helped, without it all coming to this. Unfortunately, any and all wisdom from either side in regards to immigration has been thrown out of the window. Basically, you get either "benefit tourists no immigrants" or "we don't believe in borders, to oppose any immigration is racism" and both arguments are bullshit.

A friend of mine ranted on facebook about how much he "hates" this country and that the fear of immigrants or refugees being "dangerous" (in the words of a man on the radio he heard) he referred to as racism, and was angry that nobody challenged him. What he fails to understand is:

a) The west, maybe even the world, is turning right wing, it's not just Britain or America, France will be next, possibly the Netherlands (and probably Sweden sometime soon).

b) Because of there being no proper debate on immigration, when the shit hits the fan (the incompetent response to the migrant crisis), the result is disaster, and when European security is compromised, people respond in a protectionist way and jealously guard their borders.

No wonder the world is turning right wing.

Anonymous said...

touchy subject this one