Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Labour MSP Paul Martin asks the SNP 25 questions over Murdoch links such as ‘have any Scottish Government staff been involved in phone hacking’, clown




















Dear All

Paul Martin is a Labour MSP at Holyrood.

He is the son of Michael Martin, the former MP for Springburn who was forced to resign as Speaker of the House of Commons, the first to do so in nearly 300 years.

I supported the Tory campaign for Martin to hit the bricks, not because I like Tories but because they had a point.

Michael Martin was a bad Speaker.

Paul Martin followed his father into politics, the Martin family had a stranglehold on Springburn politics hence Paul became an MSP.

He is asking questions of the SNP and particularly First Minister Alex Salmond.

The questions Labour has asked of the SNP are:

1). On what date did Alex Salmond meet with James Murdoch and what matters were discussed?

2). Who instigated the meeting between Alex Salmond and James Murdoch?

3). How many times has Alex Salmond spoken with and met with James Murdoch or other senior News International figures in the last four years?

4). When did Alex Salmond last speak to James Murdoch?

5). When does Alex Salmond next plan to speak to James Murdoch?

6). Other than Alex Salmond, have any other SNP ministers met with senior News International figures? If so, when and what was discussed?

7). Have any civil servants or taxpayer funded advisers met with News International on behalf of the Scottish government? If so, who, when and what matters were discussed?

8). In the interests of public confidence can the Scottish government assure the public that it has carried out an internal review to ensure none of its staff have been involved in phone hacking at any point?

9). What is the SNP’s position on a separate media regulator for Scotland?

10). How much public money have been spent facilitating meetings between Scottish government ministers and News international, such as the dinner Alex Salmond hosted at Bute House with the Scottish editor of the News of the World in March 2009 or the exclusive News International business breakfast in April of this year?

11). How much have the SNP spent on advertising with News International publications in each of the last four years?

12). How much public money have the SNP spent on advertising with News International publications in each of the last four years via the Scottish government?

13). How many free articles, such as Joan McAlpine’s interview with Sean Connery in the Bahamas, have the SNP provided to News International publications in each of the last four years?

14). Why did it take four full days and for the News of the World to close down before Alex Salmond (not through a spokesperson) made any official public statement on the phone hacking scandal? (Milly Dowler revelations broke on 4 July yet Alex Salmond did not speak on the issue until 8 July).

15). Why has Alex Salmond still not respond to Ann McKechin’s [shadow Scottish secretary] letter dated 8 July 2011 to all Scottish political party leaders calling for further action on phone hacking?

(The letter included calls for: assurance that the public inquiries announced by the prime minister are properly resourced, able to take evidence under oath and will start their work immediately; the scrapping and replacement of the Press Complaints Commission and a call to the industry to come up with better self-regulation; suspension of the decision by the Government on the BSkyB deal and referral to the Competition Commission and the removal of Rebekah Brooks as CEO of News International with immediate effect).

16). Given Alex Salmond’s attacks on “successive Westminster governments” for failing to properly regulate the press on how many occasions in each of his four years as First Minister has he raised this with the UK government?

17). What dialogue has the Scottish government had so far with the UK government regarding the inquiry announced by the prime minister into the broader conduct of the press?

18). What dialogue has the Scottish government had with the relevant authorities as to how many Scots have had their phones hacked?

19). Why did Alex Salmond at no point support Ed Miliband’s calls for Rebekah Brooks to resign?

20). Why did Alex Salmond at no point speak out on the BSkyB deal?

21). How many t-shirts depicting The Sun’s front page from the 5 May 2011 has the SNP sold from its online shop?

22). Why did SNP MPs contribute only two sentences in last week’s emergency debate on phone hacking?

23). What contact have SNP MPs had with senior News International figures?

24). Is Alex Salmond worried that he has had his phone hacked?

25). What motivated the SNP to share an office building with News International in Edinburgh?

These are 25 questions which are nothing more than an attempt at muck raking, and flagging up how stupid Labour MSP Paul Martin is!

Let’s look at question number 8.

“In the interests of public confidence can the Scottish government assure the public that it has carried out an internal review to ensure none of its staff have been involved in phone hacking at any point?”

It is quite disgraceful to suggest that Scottish Government staff have been involved in phone hacking when there has been no evidence to support such a bizarre claim.

And given an internal investigation would be beyond the ability of the Scottish Government due to human rights legislation, it rather shows how ignorant Paul Martin is to allow such a question to be asked in the first place.

This question is clearly asked by a person with a low IQ.

Another gem of wisdom from Labour MSP Paul Martin is in question number 21:

“How many t-shirts depicting The Sun’s front page from the 5 May 2011 has the SNP sold from its online shop?”

And the Labour Party wonders why people are turning away from them!

What a clown!

Yours sincerely

George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University

1 comment:

tris said...

Yes I agree. The Hon. Paul Martin is a muppet, there only because of his father. Like everything else, he even owes his "hon" style to the fact that his father, against the wishes of the already corrupt lords, was sent among them by Brown.

Has the Labour party done any kind of inquiry itself to find out how many of its people were phone hacking? Idiot. It was journalists who were DOING the hacking. It was political people and aides who were were BEING HACKED. Pay attention at the back the Hon Paul!

The man is the new Lord ffoukes. The nobility in the Labour is of even lower intellectual quality than their Tory counterparts, and that's saying something.