Dear All
Next Tuesday, 26th November sees
the launch of the White Paper on independence, this document is effectively the
last chance saloon for the Yes Camp to try and kick start their failing
campaign.
The BBC along with other news agencies is
covering the release of the document; the BBC is also doing a programme
discussion regarding the various issues raised and I have been invited to be
part of that BBC programme.
As one of Scotland’s emerging political
bloggers, it seems that my views do in fact appeal to a wide ranging audience.
I am use to seeing the BBC regularly pop up on the blog from time to time,
spending hours reading countless pages from London. I just thought it was
someone doing a bit of research; it appears it may have been more than that; it
seems perhaps I was being vetted.
Anyway, what I would say to anyone is you
should have a go at blogging yourself;, all it takes is commonsense and to look
beyond rhetoric, think for yourself.
So, if you want to hear the George Laird
view on the BBC, then tune into the BBC programme discussion.
I will be on my best behaviour, wasn’t
expected to be asked.
On the issues expected to be mentioned is
finance, how things will be paid for, and the speech that will be delivered is
probably been written and rewritten as the SNP seeks to present the White paper
in the best possible light.
Hard questions need to be asked, but this
is all about Alex Salmond and Scotland’s unpopular Deputy First Minister Nicola
Sturgeon set piece grandstanding.
When it comes to finance, an independent
Scotland would need to cut spending or increase taxes for its finances to be
sustainable in the long term.
Year on year in this SNP Government people
are seeing services cut and budgets being slashed as austerity kicks in, there
is talk of recovery and growth, but in some respects it is ‘paid’ for by those
at the bottom being squeezed.
A new report by the Institute for Fiscal
Studies (IFS) warns that an independent Scotland would face a "fiscal
gap".
Mind the gap!
Well, someone better mind the gap; along
time ago I was blogging repeatedly as a theme that the task of this session of
the Scottish Parliament should have been about Government and local Government
reform.
That didn’t happen, it can’t happen now
before the vote, and therefore Scotland at a Governmental level is unprepared
for independence.
That means trouble, big trouble, the kind
of big trouble that leads Scotyland on the same road as Greece.
Finance Secretary John Swinney said the
analysis "underlines the case for an independent Scotland".
Actually, it doesn’t, everything cannot be
solved by independence, most independent countries have economic problems; some
like Greece, Italy and Spain have seen civil unrest, not just in streets but
within their own Parliaments.
Alistair Darling, of Better Together is
having a terrific independence campaign, post 2014 defeat of Alex Salmond, he
should be in line for a knighthood at the very least.
Anyway Darling says the new report left the
SNP's economic case for independence "in tatters".
Making up policy ‘on the hoof’ isn’t smart,
the SNP have done knee jerk short term thinking, PR stunts to attempt to get
vote caches using issues such as the bedroom tax. We know nothing about how
welfare will operate in Scotland but we do know that Alex Salmond and the SNP
are against the bedroom tax, on paper at least. Think of this, they are
building a house around the fact they already purchased the sofa, cart before
the horse.
The Institute
for Fiscal Studies report, entitled Financial Sustainability of an
Independent Scotland flags up many issues that the SNP are weak on such as how
much debt Scotland inherited from the UK, the interest it paid on the debt, the
age of the population and potential changes in oil revenues and immigration
rates.
So, don’t kid yourself that everything is
in hand.
Alex Salmond is banking a lot on North Sea
oil revenues, the SNP have never really departed from their failed 1970’s
campaign that it is Scotland’s Oil. It didn’t resonant then and it will not
resonant now in present day Scotland.
The think tank analysis of Scotland’s
problems said "even under the most optimistic scenario" bringing national
debt down would require something like a 6% reduction in total public spending,
a rise of 9% on the basic rate of income tax or a VAT rate of 28%.
If you think you are going to get a Nordic
Welfare system, you are being deceived by the SNP; everything appears to be
Nordic, presumably because Scotland’s unpopular Deputy First Minister Nicola
Sturgeon likes Borgen, a TV show.
The independence referendum takes place on
18 September 2014, with voters in Scotland being asked the yes/no question:
"Should Scotland be an independent
country?"
If you have followed the polls, you would
have seen the answer time and time again, working class people are going to
vote No!
It’s a matter of trust, people can accept
mistakes but there comes a point where all goodwill has been used up due to
deception, misinformation and what can be only described as outright lying.
Just as you can’t buy independence you
can’t lie your way there either.
Nationalists take note.
Gemma Tetlow, one of the authors of this
report, said Scotland would face "even tougher choices" than the UK
as a whole over the long term.
Didn’t George Laird say previously we faced
austerity over decades?
Yes, oh how the less than ‘great minds’ of
Salmond and Sturgeon must rue the day, that they took their party on the road
to cronyism.
#Radicalthinking a new joke in the SNP
among the many drones around Nicola Sturgeon’s arse, so many hard pressed to
political butt cheeks. And apparently so proud of that fact as well, some
people are easily pleased.
Back to the big picture; Tetlow added:
"Revenues from the North Sea will
probably decline and official population projections suggest that the average
age of the Scottish population will increase more rapidly than for the UK as a
whole, putting greater upward pressure on many areas of public spending."
This may help UKIP in their bid to leave
the European Union, the worse it gets, the more chance people will want to halt
immigration and that means voting to leave. Some time ago I proposed that the
EU need reform and part of that reform was an internal immigration policy; well
already accept that all EU members have the right to set external policy in
this area. The EU needs to evolve now that it has grown to 27 member states, it
should have happened some time ago, however, there has been a lack of political
will in so many areas where there should be common ground.
Tetlow’s take is realistic, it paints a
grim picture:
"As a result, to ensure long-run
fiscal sustainability, an independent Scotland would need to cut public
spending and/or increase other tax revenues more than would be required across
the UK as a whole."
Alistair Darling said:
"This sober and impartial analysis by
the IFS leaves the SNP's economic case for independence in tatters. SNP
ministers pretend that in an independent Scotland there would be more money to
spend, but that notion has been comprehensively demolished by the analysis from
this respected institution. Today's report is clear that an independent
Scotland would need big cuts to things like pensions, benefits and the NHS or a
big increase in tax. This report sets a major test for the SNP's White Paper.
If the White Paper does not face up to the long-term consequences of leaving
the UK, then it won't be worth the paper it is written on."
So, on Tuesday, the White paper needs to
answer so much, not a spun narrative of wishful thinking but actual nuts and
bolts, and also spell out Plan B for currency which is either a Scottish pound
or as I see it, the SNP hedging bets for the Euro.
Blair Jenkins, chief executive of the
pro-independence Yes Scotland campaign, said:
"Only a yes vote can put in place the
economic levers to produce policies best suited to the needs and aspirations of
our people and provide a change of course from the City of London economic
model. The urgency of independence to meet the demographic challenges ahead is
further highlighted. It is extraordinary to see in black and white that UK
policies are expected to result in a decline in the population of working age
people in Scotland. That makes it clearer than ever before that Westminster is
not working for Scotland - and we quite simply cannot afford to stay in the
UK."
Given that Jenkins takes the SNP line,
perhaps he can explain why so many independent countries are failing
economically?
Many people are simply fed up with the SNP
‘positive’ ‘it’s all the fault of Westminster’ campaign.
There is a lot of talk and not a lot is
productive, will the White paper remedy this deficit or will it be the same line
as usual?
Will Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon turn
it all round for them, you can catch the George Laird view on the BBC radio
programme this Tuesday.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow
University
2 comments:
Hopefuls you will be allowed to state some facts on the radio show. Not the mounting assertions spewing from SNP HQ.
I suspect Gordon Brewer goes easy on SNP spokepeople through sheer cringeworthy claims they make.
May I refresh your memory by reminding you of a letter to the Scotsman newspaper of 30/8/13 from Prof. J. Robin who referred to Prof B. Quinn on the uncertainties of a currency union. "Quinn is a giant among central bankers whose experience , knowledge and understanding of all the practical aspects of monetary and currency issues extends far beyond the glib financial pygmies promoting indenpence".When the nats try and silence Professional people we really have to start worrying.
Post a Comment