Dear All
Today, it seems that Scotland’s Nelson Mandela, Tommy
Sheridan has received some rather bad news in his campaign to clear his name.
Former News of the World editor Andy Coulson has been
cleared of committing perjury.
Tommy Sheridan must have been looking for a winner to his case
a boost as he tries to get the verdict against him set aside.
The case against Andy Coulson collapsed after his defence
team successfully argued there was no case to answer.
Outside the High Court in Edinburgh Coulson said:
"I am obviously delighted by the judge's decision
today. It was the right decision. This prosecution was always wrong. I didn't
lie and the prosecution, in my view, was a gross waste of public money. I am
just delighted that after four pretty testing years that my family and myself
have finally had a good day."
In a post, I wrote on 20th May, I opined:
“Regardless how the trial of Andy Coulson turns out, this
doesn’t affect the evidence that convicted Tommy Sheridan such as the
confession to a room full of witnesses and also the video evidence of his
confession”.
Judge Lord Burns ruled the Crown had not shown Mr Coulson's
evidence was relevant in the Sheridan trial.
It seems the Judge decided to inform the jury that perjury
was the giving of false evidence under oath which is relevant to the issues in
that trial.
I wonder if Judge Burns reads my blog!
Probably not, but at least his judgment is sound, he added that
was for him as a judge to decide rather than the jury on that matter.
Lord Burns said that after two days of legal submissions the
Crown had not satisfied him that Mr Coulson's evidence had been relevant. Other
posts which I had done on the Sheridan trial came to the same conclusion, if
you strip away everything from the News of World you still end up with Tommy
Sheridan confessing to a room full of witness and the videotape evidence.
The Crown Office has until Wednesday to decide if they will
appeal, if they do appeal, they will just be going through the motions; the
Judge has made a sound legal judgment which is very difficult to argue against.
An appeal with be a show for the public, and to prove there
is no bias on their part, but in the end it would be a waste of time, money and
resources.
Where does leave Tommy Sheridan in his quest for a quashing of
his conviction, between a rock and a hard place!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
4 comments:
Without blushing Tommy now demands an inquiry into the millions wasted by police and prosecution investigating all of Tommy's twists and turns. To save a few bob I conclude this all started because Tommy wanted a bit of jam role on the side. All this because he couldn't handle a red face. No CIA or FBI or MI5 or the many other organisations his deluded followers allege framed him.
He was simply caught out. He's fortunate no one has really looked at his wife's part in all this. Now that would be embarrassing.
No doubt 'Citizen Tommy' was following the standard Nationalist modus operandi, that the 'truth' is what they say it is...
Sadly for him he was the only one that thought this.
http://athousandflowers.net/2014/06/03/the-trouble-with-tommy/
Stuart
My heart is bleeding for the permatanned one " not" however i doubt reality will ever kick in for this man.
great NEWS all round, poor Tommy , wonder if he misses all those "freindships" he made while in prison, still any hole in a storm
Post a Comment