Dear All
On the 4th September 2010, I attended the SNP
National Assembly in Perth ;
two things I proposed at that event were a national Police force and a national
fire service. Given the size of Scotland ,
I was confident if done properly these national services would be able to work
properly.
To sidetrack for a second, the SNP idea for integrating
British Transport Police with Police Scotland I don’t agree with, this measure
would be needed if Scotland
had become independent. In stage two of my idea for Police reform, all law
enforcement agencies would come under the one umbrella and the Police would
have a phased in approached towards an armed police force.
This would be needed due to the small size of what would be
a standing Scottish military, therefore people experiences in weapon training
and handling would act as a back up to the military in times of national
emergency, but takes time to be proficient.
Police Scotland
was rushed through; the reason for this was that the SNP Government where all
off chasing independence when they should have been at their desks doing their
paid jobs. Kenny MacAskill, the ‘justice minister’ wasn’t a supporter and given
the Pig’s ear that Police Scotland ended up as, he gets part of the blame.
Any country which is civilised needs a police service;
everyone recognises that as a self evident. That being said, the service needs
to be run properly and that comes down to leadership and culture. When Police
Scotland emerged the structures were wrong and I have to say I wouldn’t have
had Chief Constable Sir Stephen House as my first round draft pick. Stephen
House had to get the service up and running in too short a time span, that
wasn’t his fault, it was the fault of the SNP. As to what was expected of him
and the services that again was the fault of the SNP. The Police should and
need to be effectively out with the control of politicians on an operational
level.
Politicians however need and should have an oversight role,
in my idea for a national force; there would be a triple lock of
accountability, local boards, national board and new Justice 3 committee. Minor
concerns could be handled by the local boards, if something arose that was of a
more serious nature then it could be passed to the national board. Justice 3 would
only step in if something was of such significance that government intervention
was the only remedy.
There have been numerous stories in the public domain which
have called into question how the Police service is operating. This has led to
opposition politicians rounding on Chief Constable Sir Stephen House and senior
Police Scotland management. One such concern is a critical report into the
force’s use of stop and search. If the Police have to stop and search someone
they should have reasonable cause, not because officers have been given a
target to meet and if it is not met it could affect their chances of
advancement in the service.
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie has told the Scottish
Police Federation (SPF) his party no longer had confidence in Sir Stephen House.
I wouldn’t say although there are major concerns, it is too early to talk about
replacing House, if you are getting rid of him, you have to do an entire clear
out. Rennie said politicians had “too
often” been told things on a list of controversial issues only to discover they
were “untrue”.
We don’t expect the Police to lie, and we absolutely should
demand that lying to politicians is strictly out of bounds. The problem with
lying is that one, you have to remember it forever, and secondly it always
comes out in the end. Labour leader Jim Murphy and Conservative leader Ruth
Davidson at present aren’t calling for the chief constable’s departure but instead
have expressed concerns about leadership and oversight which is pretty standard.
In what must appear to be the ‘kiss of death’, unpopular First
Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she still has confidence in Stephen House but
qualified that remark by saying no chief constable should be “a law unto
themselves”.
This is called hedging your bets, if the heat gets too much
and the SNP look weak on law and order, Stephen House will be an expandable
asset, however it is as I said rather early to be talking about replacement,
the phrase, ‘you broke it, you bought it’ comes to mind.
In what must be another in the series of blunders, Nicola
Sturgeon said she did not agree with her political opponents about a lack of
accountability, which tends to suggest to me at least, ‘too wee, too poor and
too stupid’ on her part. How many blunders, mismanagement and lies would it
take for Sturgeon to recognise a problem staring her in the face?
Given her track record at health which could be
characterised as poor and patchy, she isn’t best placed to talk about
recognising accountability is she?
SPF chairman Brian Docherty made some points which I would
agree with, further cuts to police budgets should be stopped and that the culture
of targets is counter productive, the police service isn’t a business on the
front line.
Docherty added:
“Policing cannot be explained in pure statistical terms for
what is measurable is not always meaningful and the meaningful is not always
measurable. Police statistics have become something of a ‘newspeak’ for the way
in which we quantify success. They demand swathes of resources and if things
keep going as they currently are we will soon have more people counting than we
will actually delivering the job”.
Unfortunately Police Scotland cannot be taken offline and
fixed, so the problems have to be sorted out internally as hey do along, but
what does it say that front line officers are still under the impression that
volume targets exist for stop and search?
It ends to such to me that route and branch reform is needed
not just of Police Scotland but also of the Police Board and if that means some
people connected to the SNP have to be replaced then Nicola will have to find
them a park bench to sit on with the same payday naturally!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
3 comments:
There should never, ever be targets for public services that use a considerable amount of their resources reacting to incidents. The NHS, Police and Fire Brigade - to name some - are such services.
What you put in place instead are Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs). These are better than simple targets, as they look at the performance as a whole.
Accountability still remains, and such data can still be audited. They are also a good indicator as to how a service is performing, and can highlight potential issues long before they become serious.
When you centralise a public service, you first run a pilot scheme to see how things operate under a new system, and sort out issues and processes before moving into a phased centralisation.
The whole centralisation of the Police was in my opinion rushed. The main purpose was political - not operational efficiency. Cut the savings in civilian staff in order to increase uniformed police. Gives a nice "additional 1,000 police officers" soundbite.
I don't trust any politician when they start offloading the blame onto the operators. The political masters are still ultimately responsible. If the Chief Constable has to resign - then so has the Justice Secretary. That's the price for having political power.
Perhaps Sturgeon should explain why Police Stations are now closed at night. Even in large towns.
Maybe they need the money to pay for her salary.......
This female was useless at running the NHS, she'll be even more useless at running Scotland. It's begining to show more and more as the weeks go by. As many are beginning to now realise, Scotland is turning into a police state with identity cards, state minders for every child, no-one (msp's) allowed to to criticise the SNP leadership etc etc. There really is a dark veil of secrecy descending over Scotland, and it's all coming from the SNP dictatorship at Holyrood. The 2 SNP councillors who resigned from the party a few weeks ago were right when they more or less described the Natz as becoming sinister with their secrecy, and their refusal to let anyone speak out.
"There really is a dark veil of secrecy descending over Scotland, and it's all coming from the SNP dictatorship at Holyrood" how far was an institution that is a clone of westminster ever realistically going to fall from that tree?
Post a Comment