Dear All
In September 2010, I went to the SNP National Assembly, at
this event; I proposed two things, that Scotland should have a National Police
force, now called Police Scotland, and the National Fire service.
During the discussion and on this blog, I laid out how the
Police Service would have a triple lock of accountability.
Local boards, a National board and oversight by a new
creation at Holyrood; the Justice 3 Committee, Justice 3 wouldn’t have any
members of the other justice committees as members.
This was to expand the knowledge base at Holyrood among the deeply
ignorant SNP MSPs who quite frankly need all the help they can get.
The SNP in the shape of Marco Biagi scribbled down my
suggestions; this was before he was an MSP.
Anyway, the idea I put forward in detail wasn’t how Police
Scotland ended up.
Now, Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser wants a change to make
Chief Constable Sir Stephen House more accountable to the public. Under his
idea, Police Scotland would have a two-tier system operating.
Serious crimes dealt with by a national police force and
community crimes handled by 32 local forces sharing boundaries with Scotland’s
32 local authorities.
Well, it’s an idea but I can’t say I share his enthusiasm;
Police Scotland has had a lot of criticism mainly due to the way that it has
been run, and some of those criticisms are justified.
Stephen House wasn’t my first choice for Chief Constable, he
probably got the job based on the fact he ran what was then called Strathclyde
Police. It seems people are not happy
about several aspects of how the service is run; the ‘Strathclydeisation’
across Scotland didn’t go down well. Other clangers include high levels of stop
and search, armed police stopping motorists and the mounted riot police patrol
in sleepy backwaters like Inverness.
Do Police horses need days out in Inverness?
I would say no, what they were doing in Inverness is
anyone’s guess, but wasting their time must figure high on the list!
One thing is certain there are not enough checks and
balances in place to hold the force to account.
Speaking at the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities
(Cosla) annual conference, Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser said the current
system under Police Scotland was “failing”.
He said:
“Instead of enhanced accountability and scrutiny, what we
have seen is a sorry saga of centralising authority, of a loss of community
policing, of closures of public counters. Add to that the fiasco over
stop-and-search, the row over routinely armed police officers, and the seemingly
utter inability of the police authority to hold the chief constable to account,
and it is clear that all is not well when it comes to the accountability of
what should be a publicly responsive police service.”
The problem is management issues, coupled with lack of
vision. As to the closures of public counters, whether there was a national
force this would probably not have prevented this aspect of resource
management.
Murdo Fraser said the Conservative-proposed policing review
would look at improving local accountability. Police Scotland was rushed
through under the SNP and the deadbeat Justice Sec Kenny MacAskill who didn’t
display judgment or leadership.
It should have been ‘hands on’ to effect the change, but the
tendency in the SNP is to let others do the work and take the credit for it.
MacAskill was never a supporter of the national force idea which explains a
lot.
Murdo Fraser added:
“We think this proposed system could work very well, like it
has in other European countries such as Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain. Already
local councils employ community wardens to deal with local crime, and there’s
no reason in principle why the administration of community police forces cannot
also fall under the same local authority umbrella.”
The idea of Police Scotland was to remove boundaries and
have an integrated police force to share resources and experience while at the
same time protect front line policing from cuts to personnel by savings.
A huge failure of the Police Scotland idea under the SNP was
the ability of the Scottish Police Authority to hold the force to account.
Some people just take the money and run, or keep quiet, go
along to get along. The Chief Constable Stephen House was called in front of
Holyrood’s justice sub-committee following concern about the high number of
under 12s stopped and searched by the police.
People and that includes the under 12s should only be
stopped and search if, and only if there is a reasonable cause to do so.
It shouldn’t be done on spec or to make up a target which I
feel is counter productive to good community relations, even with the under
12s. Although targets are a good thing in some respects, they aren’t, if it
eats up Police Officers time taking them away from the solving of crime. There
is also an issue regarding so-called consensual stop and searches on juveniles
despite Police Scotland saying it had ceased to carry them out some six months
before.
People expect if a Police organisation says it has ceased an
activity that we can trust fully that their word is their bond.
And if it has to be done as I say, that there is good cause
driven by evidential circumstances.
As to armed officers responding to incidents; I don’t have a
problem with this aspect, provided that the incident of a routine stop such as
for driving doesn’t end up as a Police Convention.
If two unarmed traffic cops can issue a speeding ticket, I
don’t think anyone can justify four armed police hanging about looking tacky or
giving each other moral support.
This practice should be revised.
Again, it seems that Police Scotland made a pledge then
promptly broke it regarding sending armed officers to incidents where there wasn’t
a threat to life.
Calum Steele, general secretary of the Scottish Police
Federation, said he did not think Mr Fraser’s approach was necessary.
He added:
“We must be approaching a general election, because
politicians are trying to make names for themselves. Local accountability
within the police service has not worked as well as it could, but that does not
mean the problems cannot be rectified.”
Jumping in to defend the indefensible, Scotland’s unpopular
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said:
“There are more local councillors involved in the governance
of Police Scotland now under the single service than was the case under the old
eight separate forces. Police Scotland was put together as an amalgamated force
for very well-known reasons, to make sure that as we were maximising the
resources going to front-line policing and minimising the resources that were
taken up by having eight chief constables and all of the associated bureaucracy
that goes with that. It’s partly because we’ve amalgamated the eight police
forces into Police Scotland that we’re able to maintain 1,000 extra police on
the streets.”
It was a deal with the Scottish Conservatives that put 1,000
extra police on the streets in the first place, and if there is more
accountability presumably based on number of councillors, then why are there
still problems?
Are they simply ignored?
Are they not speaking up?
Are they unfit for purpose?
Does having people close to the SNP like Jeanne Freeman
enhance that greater scrutiny and more accountability?
Apparently ex Labourite Jeanne Freeman is a ‘quango queen’
who is said to rake in about £50k a year and no one publicly elected her.
Deputy Chief Constable Rose Fitzpatrick said:
“The creation of a single policing service has resulted in
greater scrutiny and more accountability than ever before – at a local level
with more than twice as many local councillors now involved in the scrutiny of
policing than under previous arrangements.
The way policing is now delivered puts local communities’
concerns at the heart of our policing priorities. National specialist units
support our local policing teams to ensure equal access to specialist resources
whenever and wherever the need.”
Maybe she can explain the mounted riot police in Inverness?
A Scottish Government spokesman said:
“The introduction of Police Scotland has strengthened
accountability and local policing. Reform of Police Scotland has allowed us to
protect frontline policing with over 1,000 additional officers out protecting
the public and keeping communities safe. This is in stark contrast to the
situation in England and Wales where officer numbers have continued to fall for
the last 12 years.”
Oh look, a typical Nationalist dig at the English, we aren’t
interested what the English are doing regarding policing, the issue is Police
Scotland. Yet again, unpopular Nicola Sturgeon shows her complete lack of class
and clearly shows she is unable to deal with the real issues.
Having made the mess, the SNP is utterly incapable of
solving their own self made problems of tinkering, unpopular Nicola Sturgeon is
right about one thing, the service cannot be allowed to go backwards, trouble
is that Sturgeon cannot take the Police service forward!
Finally, one of Nicola Sturgeon’s Glasgow homosexual SNP
activists took a well known filthy Glasgow street beggar up a dark alley in
Glasgow, prior to entering the alley which has one way in and one way out, he
checked his wallet.
If he had taken a Shetland pony up the alley as well, could
Nicola Sturgeon tell us all what crimes could have been committed, beyond
cruelty to animals?
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
The police need oversight (and that is from a friend who is an ex-copper). Not only that, Holyrood needs a second chamber to oversee and block some of the crap legislation that is pouring out of there.
ReplyDeleteI agree that centralising the Police is a good idea, but it's been screwed up. And with all the savings since McAskil closed the courts, could they not use this to keep open the bloody police stations at night?
The last bit is of course read in your best Harry Callaghan voice George.
ReplyDeleteAnother decent blog Mr Laird I do so enjoy them .
ReplyDeleteHi Freddy
ReplyDeleteSome people however don't it seems enjoy the blog, taste is fickle.
George
What can i say George you can't force your views down someones throat unless you're a nat right enough :)
ReplyDeleteYou really are a little snot! A bogle and a pimple! And I am sure you have a tiny tinkle winkle!
ReplyDeleteDear Anon
ReplyDelete"You really are a little snot! A bogle and a pimple! And I am sure you have a tiny tinkle winkle!"
I am 5'7" to I reject the wee snot accusation.
As to this "tiny tinkle winkle", I am sure you have issues to be getting dealt with.
George
LOl at least give us the pleasure of your name or are you nippy in disguise looking for a bit of george's winkle. It is hard for the regulars to figure out. Maybe Mr Morell isn't up to the Job however most of the regulars on this page would turn their noses up @ servicing her.
ReplyDelete