The Day the Scottish Ministerial Code No Longer Exists; Disgraced SNP Leader Nicola Sturgeon refuses to resign after Holyrood Inquiry says she 'misled parliament' over the Alex Salmond affair, her corrupt Crown Office, the 'Wolffe Pack' is actively hunting down publishers on the internet and threatening them with legal action if they don't remove evidence against her, the emergence of a legal Waffen SS to censor the press shows Scotland is a failed State and that UK Government intervention is vital, necessary and urgent

Dear All 

The SNP answer to being exposed in the Salmond scandal is to bring forward measures for more oppression, and injustice. To give their diseased policies, the appearance of being legitimate, they have roped in third parties to help do their dirty work. Organisations which they effectively control by funding. Scotland is becoming like Europe, not the Europe of 2021, but the Europe of the 1940's under Nazi occupation. Dissent is not tolerated against the SNP, free speech and free expression is being banned, and the Crown Office, the corrupt legal Waffen SS of the Sturgeon regime is on the march! Just had Hitler and Karl Donitz had their 'wolf packs' patrolling the shipping lanes in the North Atlantic, Sturgeon has her 'Wolffe pack' patrolling the internet, like the Nazis, the 'Wolffe pack' based in the Crown Office is looking for vulnerable victims. 

The victims' crime, telling the truth! 

So far, due to budget constraints, it is highly unlikely if Sturgeon's corrupt legal Waffen SS get you into court and fitted up, you will be put into a political re-education camp. You will have to make do with prison as a 'prisoner of political conscience'. It is entirely reasonable to expect a slew of political and press convictions will be coming down the pipeline as a warning to others. I think everyone who has watched the Salmond scandal is clear that the Scottish Government is corrupt, the Crown Office in Scotland is corrupt, and both work hand in glove. Just recently, an oppression story in Scotland, and in a university caught my eye, a female student was banned from Aberdeen University's union for two weeks for 'discrimination'. Her crime was saying 'Rule Britannia' during a debate on the British Army. The crime of free speech is now in place in Scotland's Universities, at least at Student Union level. How long before this moves from the student union into the main university campus and becomes policy is anyone's guess. Elizabeth Heverin, 19, received the ban after quoting the historic anthem prompted another student to complain.  

Miss Heverin (the victim) said: 

'It feels like I've been prosecuted for the crime of being patriotic, it's scary to think where freedom of speech at the university will go from here.'  

Over the years, we have seen the growth of anti English and anti UK rhetoric flourish in Scotland, the storm troopers being the cybernats, the personal SA of the SNP leadership. The SNP's Sturmabteilung which translates as literally "Storm Detachment", is the SNP's original paramilitary wing who march around in big groups waving flags, and abusing anyone suspected of being pro UK. They patrol social media checking up on the disloyal, the enemies of the Sturgeon regime, they sit, they watch, they record, they wait. They are always there in the light and in the shadows, like a secret subsection of the SNP movement. 

In the Aberdeen University debate, we get to learn the mindset of the changing face of oppression, students discussed renewing a union policy on a de-militarised campus. This measure would actively bar military personnel from recruiting students. As someone who taught students at university, why should a minority impose their will on the majority just because they hold a small unrepresentative position of power. The Armed services of the United Kingdom represents not only a career path but also a chance to serve our country and stand ready to help others. Why should a minority seek to deny people of all colours and faiths this opportunity. This is the problem in modern Universities intolerance of others to amass power, common known as student union bullshit. One can only hope that those who have banned Miss Heverin get outed and that any future employer finds out as well, and makes a suitable decision on whether someone so intolerant has any place in their business. 

Another gem of intolerance with more potential for harm is the idea of specialist courts in Scotland that should be set up to deal with the most serious sex crimes. But here is the rub, there is a suggestion that cases will be heard by a single judge with no jury. We have a corrupt Scottish Government, we have a corrupt Crown Office, the last piece of the puzzle for a foolproof setup for convictions is a corrupt judge. Can you wrap your head around SNP Judges? How are judges picked, well they are appointed by the Queen, on recommendation of the First Minister. The Queen is just a rubber stamp, you see the real work is done by  the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland (JABS). And who appoints the members? The board is chaired by a lay member, who is appointed to the position by the Scottish Ministers. It might take some time but in theory over time, we could see SNP Judges on the benches, loyal to the SNP. This is because of the input of the First Minister, and we already know that Nats are in public bodies and the legal profession. 

You could have a situation in criminal trials in Scotland where you are accused by an SNP member of a sex crime, you get charged and fitted up by Sturgeon's corrupt legal Waffen SS of the Crown Office. In cuffs brought before a court in front of an SNP judge with no protection from a jury. Do you think if Alex Salmond was retried under this system, he would walk free? I don't think so, to me the system would be open to abuse. Here is a video clip of 1940's German criminal trial by one of the most famous Nazi Judges Roland Freisler. You might think, that couldn't happen here, after seeing the attempted stitch up of Alex Salmond by people close to Nicola Sturgeon, are you so sure? In order to get a fool proof corrupt system in place, you need the three key parts. False witnesses, corrupt Crown Office and an SNP Judge with no jury. Only two parts where available to Team Sturgeon. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNi5256dhvM 

To get a foolproof system akin to a witch trial where accusation equals guilt takes time, so what they have to do is say that a review is needed as part of a shake-up of how Scottish courts deal with rape and other sexual offences cases. Then the SNP talk to what is termed Stakeholders which is code for people that will support their views. One thing we seen in the Salmond case was how quick Rape Crisis Scotland funded by the SNP Government was used as a platform to smear Alex Salmond by the 'alphabet women'. Under proposals, you might see the presumed use of pre-recorded evidence and sentencing powers of up to 10 years imprisonment. Any evidence in a criminal trial must be open to challenge does this mean that pre-recorded evidence will be assumed to be indisputable fact? I don't know but it is worth asking the question now surely? 

Although the idea to rule out juries isn't fleshed out, among the panel's other ideas is for juries to be given "plain language directions". This is to be done with a pilot programme looking at how jurors can be told about rape myths and stereotypes. To me, this is bullshit, it isn't evidence, and as such has no place in any trial. What are rape myths and stereotypes, I found an article for you to read which explains the thinking, but trials are about evidence, we shouldn't allow unrelated opinion to replace it. One idea is that the right for the complainer not to be identified should also be expressly set out in legislation, so should the right be extended also to the accused? In the Salmond scandal, how does Lady Dorrian's review deal with malicious complainers? Should a malicious complainer be allowed to walk away and hide behind court anonymity? What provision has the review put in place for that? I can see how the proposals would improve the way cases are handled for complainers, but it doesn't appear to be weighed in fairness for the accused and witnesses. Is it that the accused and witnesses are only entitled to second class justice? 

Dorrian said: 

"We decided that we really needed to start from the ground up. If we started afresh what would the court to deal with these cases look like? We have made recommendations which we believe will fundamentally change and improve the way sexual offences are prosecuted in Scotland." 

Lady Dorrian said increasing conviction rates in sex crime cases "was not a driving force" behind the group's recommendations, so why does it appear that all the stakeholders are women's advocacy groups? Of course there is no advocacy groups for rapists, but where and who were the stakeholders brought in to put a counter view to Rape Crisis Scotland, Scottish Women's Aid, Victim Support Scotland and the Crown Office? The role of the Crown Office is to convict people in a trial, not support the accused, just ask Alex Salmond. The Crown Office used the 'moorov doctrine' because they thought quantity would see them get a conviction on the basis so many charges would secure at least one or more convictions. If you throw enough shit maybe some of it will stick or at least leave a smell. In the funny article by Craig Murray called First Yes Minister, he mentions this in part of a well written piece, well worth a read. 

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/01/yes-minister-fan-fiction/ 

I like the bit in the middle, I enjoyed that a lot: 

"Minister I don’t have that many friends, Permanent Secretary. I spend all my time reading books. (Canned Laughter).
Perm Sec Oh really, Minister, think. You must have some women very close to you.
Minister Well, there is Miss Barclay, my own Private Secretary.
Perm Sec Perfect, Minister perfect! Miss Barclay should be good for at least four allegations! Get her to say he tried to kiss her. Often.
Minister But surely nobody will believe my own Private Secretary – and she was involved in putting the dossier together and in discussions on handling the case. Nobody is going to believe her. And (gasps in horror) it really leads straight back to me being behind it, doesn’t it?
Perm Sec It can’t be traced back to you, Minister.
Minister Phew, that’s a relief. It can’t be traced back to me you say. How does that work?
Perm Sec Accuser anonymity, Minister.
Minister Accuser anon… oh yes! Oh yes! I am beginning to see!! They are sexual allegations so…
Perm Sec The identities of the accusers can be kept hidden by the court under penalty of severe jail sentences for anybody who reveals them so…
Minister …the accusers can just be my closest political cronies and the public will never be aware of that! That’s brilliant, Perm Sec!
Perm Sec Thank you, Minister (Canned Laughter)" 

Comedy where would be without it? 

In the last 24 hours, something dramatic has happened, akin to someone blowing off the shithouse door with someone sitting inside. There has been a leak from possible someone inside the Salmond Inquiry, the question to ask before I get to the contents of the leak is, who does the leak benefit? This should occupy your thoughts a few minutes, the leak is said to be that the Salmond Inquiry has come to the conclusion that  First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had been found to have “misled Parliament” about her role in the Alex Salmond investigation. The leak benefits Nicola Sturgeon, and that bring me to a sky news interview of her being doorstep. In the clip, Sturgeon jumps right out of the car and straight into what seems to be a prepared narrative, something which others all over twitter have taken up. Look at the clip and the way she gets out of the car, rips the mask and goes straight into her narrative, where was the lag, where was the down time to consider matters? To me, all of this had the hallmarks of prepared strategy. The denial, the accusations, the blaming of others, contrast that grasp of facts with her performance in front of the Salmond Inquiry, 'couldn't remember', 'don't know the answer', 'not that I can recall'. 

The headline Nicola Sturgeon 'misled parliament' over Alex Salmond affair, inquiry although accurate doesn't tell you the whole picture. A better headline, more accurate is that the entire SNP membership of the Salmond Inquiry all sided with Nicola Sturgeon. The fight back by Sturgeon and the SNP has already begun, for example the #IstandwithNicola nonsense, like a ready meal, it was popped onto twitter and started trending really quickly. So, what is it the people are who are backing Nicola Sturgeon are actually backing? 

1/ That Nicola Sturgeon can lie as First Minister

2/ That the Scottish Government is corrupt.

3/ That the Crown Office is corrupt, and a tool of victimisation

4/ That evidence can be withheld from a Parliamentary Inquiry

5/ That witnesses can be withheld from a Parliamentary Inquiry

6/ That evidence can be withheld from a Court

7/ That the ministerial code doesn't apply to the SNP

8/ That innocent people can be stitched up at a Governmental level

9/ That innocent people can be taken to Court to be stitched up 

That's what the #IstandwithNicola brigade are backing, too stupid to protect their democracy, because of a simpleton notion that Nicola is their 'pal' and she wouldn't do it to them. That type of thinking in my mind makes them, the dumbest bastards walking the face of the earth. You can already see the way things are going, Nicola Sturgeon won't resign, effectively the ministerial code to regulate the behaviour of ministers no longer exists. Sturgeon has declared herself innocent, and her corrupt Crown Office is actively engaged in trying to force people to take down evidence of what actually happened in the Salmond scandal. Guido Fawkes was threatened by the Crown Office to take down evidence in the public domain on his website, he took the tack to tell them to shove it. This was one kill that the 'Wolffe pack' wasn't going to be able to make in the murky waters of the internet. 

Finally, Scotland has become a failed State, the signposts between it and Nazi Germany are glowingly obvious now. Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross said: 

"We cannot set a precedent that a First Minister of Scotland can mislead the Scottish Parliament and get away with it. We have to trust that the First Minister will be truthful. We no longer can. We have called out the First Minister based on the overwhelming evidence that she misled Parliament. We will continue to hold her to the same standards as previous First Ministers of Scotland and demand that she resigns." 

The precedent Douglas Ross speaks about has already been set, it was set when Nicola Sturgeon jumped out of her Ministerial car outside her home in Baillieston, Glasgow, and laid the foundations of the denial, the accusations, the blaming of others. What is needed is UK Government intervention, not letters of concerns, appeals to decency, appeals to conform to public standards, it's too late for that option. The way to go is to have a full UK investigation and an external judge led inquiry with sanctions, this means control returned to Westminster. Removal of civil servants both in the Scottish Government and Crown Office pending external investigation. That is where we need to be, not just tinkering with the Scotland Act, not just granting parliamentary immunity, root and branch reforms coupled with full UK investigation and an external of Scotland judge led inquiry. Let's stop thinking that the house can remain on a foundation of sand, let's pour the concrete in so that there is no way that this scandal can ever happen again. And for the record, let's make sure guilty people cannot walk away from this one either! It is time to restore justice in Scotland, and when we do, 'let's give it laldy'!

Yours sincerely 

George Laird                                                                                                                                The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University