Dear All
I think everyone is aware that the Holyrood Inquiry has been setup to fail, I think the term which will be universally adopted is that it is a 'whitewash'. There isn't a search for truth because we know that key witnesses aren't going to be called, Geoff Aberdein and Nicola Sturgeon's Chief of Staff, Liz Lloyd. The SNP Government has deliberately obstructed the work of the Inquiry by refusing co-operation and material on at least 58 separate occasions. The integrity of the Inquiry has been compromised by the Lord Advocate because the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body has been advised by the Crown Office. The Crown Office has told the SPCB that it is not in the public interest for the content of the censored Salmond submissions to be published. Yes, you read that right, The Crown Office has acted maliciously and is in no sense an impartial body is instructing the Parliament. The Crown office is also allegedly mired in the conspiracy against Alex Salmond, and it has been involved in malicious political prosecution against Alex Salmond's allies. You read their stories in the press, Mark Hirst, whose case was flung out of court because there was no case to answer. The former British Ambassador, Craig Murray, still being persecuted for allegedly supplying jigsaw evidence to identity the Alphabet women.
Craig Murray is innocent, he, like Mark Hirst is a victim of malicious prosecution!
Everything is being done to enact a cover up, this cover up is more dirty than the most celebrated one in political history which was 'Watergate'. Watergate saw the downfall of a corrupt leader, President Richard Nixon. Scotland's Watergate centres on the attempts to destroy an innocent man, Alex Salmond, when that Scottish Government's attempt failed, those closely connected to Nicola Sturgeon tried to escalate matters in an attempt to jail him. Team Sturgeon/ Alphabet in the post criminal trial continues to smear Alex Salmond. They even roped in an NGO, Rape Crisis Scotland to use as a vehicle to continue their smears hiding behind a Court anonymity. The Chief Executive is Glasgow University Graduate Sandy Brindley, I remember her from the uni campus. I didn't think much of her then and I don't think much in her judgment in the Alex Salmond affair now.
In a press release dated, September 7th 2018, Rape Crisis Scotland seemed all a glow over getting additional £1.5 million funding from the Scottish Government. Shirley-Anne Somerville, Cabinet Secretary for Social Security and Older People popped into the Rape Crisis Scotland offices and said:
“The Scottish Government has taken many actions to take forward our commitment to preventing and eradicating violence against women and girls. This includes investment in prevention work, frontline services and improvements in the justice system, as well as the introduction of landmark legislation on domestic abuse, abusive behaviour and sexual harm. We want to encourage everyone to feel able to come forward if they have been a victim of rape or sexual assault, and to be able to access the right support when they need it. That is why we are committed to supporting rape crisis centres and why we are providing additional funding of £1.5 million over the next three years. That funding will start next month, allowing them to ensure that more people can receive support and as well as helping these services plan for the future. I am delighted to have this opportunity to visit Rape Crisis Scotland to thank them for all that they and local rape crisis centres across Scotland do to support people.”
I suppose some people might raise an eyebrow about this additional £1.5 million funding, and the coincidence of Rape Crisis Scotland being such an enthusiastic cheerleader for the Alphabet women. Given that funding was 3 years ago, one would have to ask, will Rape Crisis Scotland be in line for another massive heap of cash delivered to their doorstep in 2021? And who in the Scottish Government if that happens will authorise that cash injection? Will it be SNP Leader Nicola Sturgeon or will it be delegated to someone else sitting around her Cabinet table?
And to be clear, because it needs pointing out, Alex Salmond is innocent of all the charges made against him, presumably that didn't flag up as relevant in Sandy Brindley's mind. One thing of interest, great public interest is names of Salmond's accusers, to that end, The Spectator Magazine is going to court in an attempt to challenge the ban on naming them. The press have been derelict in their duty, the impression give by them of the Alphabet women is that, they are spread across a wide Scottish Government Network and the Scottish National Party. The actual circle is rather small, in fact, it is surprisingly small according to people in the know. In a trawling operation conducted by Police Scotland of over 400 people, the Salmond accusers came from a very small group close to Nicola Sturgeon. If you are accused of something, you have the right to fight those accusations, and you should also should have the right to introduce evidence, not just to clear yourself, but to establish the possible guilt of others. In the Salmond case, part of his evidence was prohibited from being used. Despite this restriction, Alex Salmond still won his case because the jury did found in his favour, a jury which the majority of whom were in fact women.
I don't normally watch First Minister Questions, despite being a political activist, because it is a joke. It normally it isn't worth anyone's time, but the recent one however was interesting because of the questions being asked by Labour MSP Jackie Baillie. Jackie Baillie, in reference to the infamous meeting with Geoff Aberdein on 29 March 2018 said that the First Minister’s written submission to the inquiry said that the Sturgeon/Aberdein meeting was an impromptu “head-round-the-door-in-passing” event. This is the meeting that Nicola Sturgeon claims was so irrelevant that she forgotten all about. But that claim is disputed because Jackie Baillie stated:
“It was the case that the meeting was pre-arranged, and for the specific purpose of discussing the complaints made against Alex Salmond.”
What Jackie Baillie said is very definite, there no double meaning, she is saying categorically that the Sturgeon claim of impromptu “head-round-the-door-in-passing” event is false, and that the meeting was pre-arranged. This is important as I mentioned because Baillie didn’t say “allegedly” at any point of that sentence. And Jackie Baillie isn't a stupid woman who is prone to making wild public accusations, quite the opposite in fact. Apparently someone has said that they know from a very well-placed source, that Geoff Aberdein’s written evidence sent to both the Fabiani committee and the separate Hamilton investigation states the meeting was prearranged. The Aberdein evidence further allegedly states the purpose of the meeting was known by those who attended it. The Fabiani committee has blocked the Aberdein evidence from being accessible to the public. To be more accurate, the 4 SNPs and independent MSP Andy Wightman blocked it. It is also highly significant that Aberdein says that his evidence can be corroborated with evidence from other people.
If a Minister deliberately lies to parliament, they must tend their resignation. If they give false information to parliament, they must apologise and correct the error at the earliest opportunity. Nicola Sturgeon has had plenty of opportunity to amend the record before parliament and has not done so. In fact she has doubled down on her claim that she first heard about the Salmond allegations much later. I never believed that Geoff Aberdein just turned up at Holyrood to have a chat with an old friend, and then in wandering about Holyrood aimlessly, just stopped by Sturgeon's office. None of that to me rings remotely true. Are we to believe that Aberdein just stood in Sturgeon office talking about the weather with her and the price of fish? We are to swallow that in passing, Aberdein then asks Sturgeon to meet Alex Salmond a few days later, and she and her advisors don't ask the purpose of the meeting?
Does Nicola Sturgeon and her Chief of Staff Liz Lloyd think the people of Scotland are that fucking stupid?
Aberdein has submitted evidence, and he also has witnesses, but we do know his evidence is being blocked, both Aberdein and Liz Lloyd are not being interviewed by the Committee. It seems that every piece of evidence and witnesses which connects Nicola Sturgeon with misleading parliament is being excluded. The Salmond Inquiry at Holyrood is a farce, the question I suppose is when is the right time for pro UK MSPs to walk out of this whitewash. So, please watch the video, and the rather pathetic response of Nicola Sturgeon who refused to answer Jackie Baillie's question. This time, listen for Jackie Baillie saying that the Aberdein meeting with Sturgeon was prearranged, that means Sturgeon's written evidence of it being impromptu “head-round-the-door-in-passing” event would if true therefore be a lie. Geoff Aberdein's evidence must be allowed in the Salmond Inquiry, and he and Sturgeon's Chief of Staff Liz Lloyd must give evidence under oath. Those people who Aberdein is alleged to have cited as witnesses, they must also testify under oath before the Salmond Inquiry.
Finally,
the more you read, the more you realise that the SNP under Nicola Sturgeon has
made Scotland a failed State. The Scottish Government is corrupt, the Crown
Office is corrupt and the Holyrood Parliament is rotten from within under SNP
control. We can only hope that justice prevails sooner rather than later, we
should also hope that The Spectator Court case is successful. If that fails, we
can only hope that enough decent people vote for pro UK parties to remove the
SNP from power, or that there is a hung parliament which can force Nicola
Sturgeon out of public office. Of course, it isn't just Sturgeon, she is just
the poster child for the Salmond scandal, no everyone who was involved in the
cover up needs to go, and there needs to be prosecutions. That's right, jail time, no probation, years in prison custody.
Yours sincerely
George Laird The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
A side issue for you: do you know how much it has costs to fix the Edinburgh Sick Kids Hospital?......£90m.
ReplyDeleteYou could have built 7 or 8 new primary schools for that.
The chap responsible for this blunder continues to be employed by the Scottish Government. I've met him and, believe me, he's an arrogant arsehole.
It all comes down to the High Court hearing tomorrow. The Scottish Government has been issuing gagging orders for weeks now; even The Spectator was issued with one and who in Scotland reads The Spectator?
ReplyDeleteAnyway, Andrew Neil is taking it to Court and asking why Aberdein and Salmond's statements cannot be published.
All we have to say this evidence cannot be published is the opinions of 4No SNP members of the Fabiani Inquiry plus the vapid Andy Wightman.
If it is published, then she may have to resign immediately.
If it's not published, then Alex Salmond will hold a press conference to get his story across. I am sure that he has enough to sink Sturgeon, Swinney, Evans and Wolffe. He's just giving them the opportunity to state their case before he does that.
Either way you look at it, Scotland has turned into a failed state.
I think the Holyrood Inquiry is dead, George. We're depending upon The Spectator magazine now to unearth the truth. I imagine they'll unearth more in the next day or two than the Holyrood Inquiry would unearth in a year.
ReplyDeleteThe time for listening to the spoofs of Holyrood is over. Time to call upon the professionals.
Interestingly, The Scotsman is reporting that is wasn't lawyers who carried out the final redactions on previous submissions to the Inquiry, it was John Swinney. That figures doesn't it.
If The Spectator have the Court's agreement to publish the Salmond and Aberdein statements then the Sunday papers will most likely print both of them.
ReplyDeleteNo-one gives two-hoots about the Fabiani Inquiry in that case. It's redundant. It's expired. It's a dead parrot.
The Fabiani Inquiry will then meet to discuss if they are to allow it to be circulated and read by the Inquiry team. Given that the Inquiry team includes 4No SNP members plus that vapid spoof Andy Wightman, it is by no means certain waht they will do.....does it really matter any more.
If we want another Watergate, the press should investigate, not Linda Fabiani.
Brilliant article.
ReplyDeleteExcellent article.I fully believe it is past time for the swamp that is Holyrood to be drained.
ReplyDeleteHopefully the next couple of weeks will see beginning of this.
Adam Tomkins:
ReplyDeleteI gave a speech this afternoon about corruption. Holyrood is so broken it doesn’t even know it’s being lied to any more.
Salmond. Malicious prosecution. Civil servants being coached to dissemble.
Scotland is starting to stink. Of corruption.
This SNP garbage are the CURSE of SCOTLAND,full of liars. Get rid of Linda Fabiani too, so biased, not fit for purpose.
ReplyDeleteJim Sillars makes a very pertinent point.
ReplyDeleteWhy was SNP MSP Linda Fabiani, who was once sacked by Alex Salmond, allowed to be the chair of the committee investigating the SNP's dealings with Alex Salmond?
It would not have been allowed at Westminster.
We need to know the truth, hopefully the court case will allow the evidence to be published.
ReplyDeleteThis really sounds like North Korea not Scotland.
ReplyDeleteIt's plain to see there's a major cover up going on & full scale corruption
Nicola Sturgeon slaps down Alex Salmond over Russia Today chat show
ReplyDeletehttps://www.politicshome.com/news/article/nicola-sturgeon-slaps-down-alex-salmond-over-russia-today-chat-show
Did Sturgeon help the British deep state to knobble Salmond ?
I like the WoS site too. However, some of the posters there are adamant that MI5 or MI6 must be behind this. I don't know where they get this from and I don't agree with it, but they're convinced.
ReplyDeleteJim Sillars, former deputy leader of the SNP and a man of some considerable wisdom, is calling for a ‘coup’ to remove NicolaSturgeon and her rotten cabal from office.
ReplyDeleteExcellent article.
ReplyDeleteThe Spectator will hopefully win their case, and if they do I expect - hope - that Andrew Neil comes out with all guns blazing.
I expect Alex Salmond to hold a press briefing regardless of the outcome. When that happens, all hell will break loose.
It might just be enough for people to realise just what they have elected. In 14 years, Scotland has gone from a country that is some respects was punching above it's weight in some areas - notably education. Since then, standards in almost everything have dropped, and we now have a corrupt system ruled by student politics.
Do the EU really, really want to admit a country that us ruled in this manner?
I'm going for tactical voting this May. Nothing, nothing will make me vote for the SNP, Greens or one of the rapidly breeding pro-indy list parties. The SNP/Green stranglehold on Scottish politics needs removed.
E.
Remember at the end of the Westminster expenses scandal we were all shocked at MP's spending money on expensive furniture, I-pads and all the rest of it. Some went to jail for it.
ReplyDeleteWhat we have here is far worse and they insult our intelligence by laughing at it, lying to us and failing to investigate.
I personally believe that it is now so bad that it cannot remain open and I do not think that the decision to close Holyrood would be met with too much public vitriol. We all know it in't working.
Of course, our civil-service and legal profession are now crap too. But, we cannot scrap everything. Start with Holyrood and put in place some professional supervision to monitor all the rest of them.
'Evidence pointing to a deeply sinister set of events within St Andrew’s House continues to drift into the public domain. Natural justice demands all of it is heard and subjected to scrutiny by the Holyrood committee, without limit of time'.
ReplyDeleteBrian Wilson posted this on 20th January. I thought that a whistle-blower would step forward. Surely one man, or woman, in the Scottish Government was prepared to step forward and do the right thing.
Looks as if I was wrong and no-one has stepped forward. What does that tell you about Scotland? It tells me it is feckin shite nowadays. Come back here to die and be buried but live your life anywhere else in the world outside this feckin depressing dump.
She is mocking Salmond. The phoney investigation is mocking him. Who does she think she is? She's a disgrace. I was utterly surprised when Salmond let her become leader. She was never suitable to be leader. As I said in 2014...Big mistake.
ReplyDelete"Jim Sillars, former deputy leader of the SNP and a man of some considerable wisdom, is calling for a ‘coup’ to remove NicolaSturgeon and her rotten cabal from office."
ReplyDeleteThe only SNP man I actually like - more of an old-school trade union type than the lying shitbags in office.
It's official. Holyrood is fucked, rotten to the core. If it was a car, it'd be a write off. If it was a kitchen on Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares it'd be teeming with maggots, vermin, filth and rotten food (arguably it is already teeming with maggots known as the SNP). Close the fucking thing down and scrap it. It and the SNP are a disgrace and embarrassment to democracy.
Once again, an excellent insight into the disgraceful conduct of all at Holyrood. One of the maggots of Holyrood is of course Andy Wightman. If he had an ounze of backbone in him, then he would have demanded publication of Salmond and Aberdein's statements to the committee already and we wouldn't have to depend on The Spectator as we are now having to do.
ReplyDeleteIn truth, Holyrood has failed. It has turned into a delinquent parliament ruled-over by bullies like John Swinney and James Dornan. In belongs in the Eastern Europe of the 1960's. It is nowhere close to the standard required for modern day Europe.
There is a photograph I saw recently of a queue of several hundred people waiting at a soup kitched in George Square. Waiting in the snow while these SNP folk acam us all for money.
The Spectator will ensure this story is told internationally. Holyrood has taken us back 100 years.
Is it the Scottish Government which is being tested at the High Court in Edinburgh later today, or is it the Scottish judiciary itself?
ReplyDeletePerhaps more Scottish lawyers would do well to get themselves out of the pocket of John Swinney before it is too late.
He's a dead man walking. Lawyers used to be smart; surely they all know that?
If The Spectator are successful later today and the statements by Salmond an Aberdein are found to be legal, then we should be expecting immediate resignations from Scotgov.
ReplyDeleteI don't know about you George, but I am finding the language used on this site is deteriorating to the point where it will become a real concern for delicate folk. You have some delicate folk, don't you? Some delicate folk pop-in from time to time to read what's going-on? Surely.
ReplyDeleteVapid tool of Sturgeon's Junta, James Wolffe QC, agrees that a judge-led inquiry into the mallicious prosecution of the Duff and Phelps Directors will take place, but it won't neccessarily be led by an overseas judge. It won't be led by an overseas judge then. You can bet on it.
ReplyDeleteIs today D-Day for Sturgeon?
ReplyDeleteIf Fraser Nelson of The Spectator is successfull then the flood gates open and she will have to face-up to all documented evidence that she always promised she was going to.
Is Fraser Nelson Scotland's Bob Woodward?
Dear Anon
ReplyDelete"I don't know about you George, but I am finding the language used on this site is deteriorating to the point where it will become a real concern for delicate folk. You have some delicate folk, don't you? Some delicate folk pop-in from time to time to read what's going-on? Surely."
Part of the job of posting is to convey emotion, this is done in literature, all the time, even in the Bible describing horrible acts. I think your objection is the use of the F word followed by the word stupid. This was to highlight the contempt that Sturgeon and Lloyd hold the Scottish people in. It was also to draw your attention to the point which as you are now commenting on it proves its value. Everyone has heard, and has used swear words in the life. Haven't you? Normally I don't run with swear words in posts, so when I do, you should understand their purpose, you get you to think about the point I am making.
We are talking about corruption here in relation to the Alex Salmond scandal, and if you think that doesn't matter because it isn't happening to you, think again. Everyone's rights are important, and everyone's rights have to be fought for. And the State cannot be allowed to deny the rights of any citizen regardless of status. Do you now understand where I am coming from?
Democracy has to be fought for, especially when evil people seize control of it.
George
Relax George - much of the bad language is mine.
ReplyDeleteThe High Court hearing seems to be going well enough. As I see it, Alex Salmond's statement has been gone through by his legal team and redacted to protect witnesses anyway.
All we need from the hearing is the go-ahead for The Spectator to publish this. It has published it on its website already. Publish it in The Spectator printed edition and the flood gates are opened.
The only area where our legal profession have excelled themselves is in ensuring lifelong anonymity to the accusers. The fact that the conspirators are also the accusers is an irony that somehow has escaped them.
I have met government lawyers and they are all fannies. One or two of them need bagged after this.
Support for independence has now dropped below 50%, at last. Currently standing at 47% according to Reuters.
ReplyDeleteThankfully, I was educated pre-Curriculum for Excellence and so I do not have half my brain missing.
Momentum is everything in politics and the SNP are dropping like a stone at the moment. I'm only surprised it isn't by far more.
Alex Salmond Inquiry has descended into a farcical, Kafkaesque game of rigged Cluedo – Kenny MacAskill MP
ReplyDeleteThe so-called Salmond Inquiry’s descending from the simply failing to the utterly farcical.
I understand that if Geoff Aberdein's statement is released to the press, Sturgeon is a goner.
ReplyDeleteI believe that Doberman-Pinschers were bred to guard German tax collectors from gangsters. We have a Doberman-Pinscher that lives locally and it is fabulous. No-one messes with it.
ReplyDeleteI would buy myself one if I were you. I said this before I know but you just cannot be too careful in Scotland these days.
Also, check under your Toyota and under your coal-bunker for IED's. That's what I always do.
@spectator
ReplyDeletewins its legal challenge over Salmond trial court orders: Lady Dorrian to vary an order which now allows Salmond and Geoff Aberdein evidence to be published