Dear All
Years ago, when I was looking at education and who sits
where, I found out that colleges in Scotland had people from universities senior
management sitting on the college boards. At the same time, I was looking at
the Scottish Funding Council in terms of who gets what in cash terms. The
biggest bulk of cash coming from the Scottish Government goes to what are known
as the ‘ancient’ universities, places like Glasgow ,
St Andrews and Edinburgh , Aberdeen
and Dundee . At the bottom end of the financial
scale in terms of cash were the colleges, in recent years there has been a restructure
of the college sector with ‘mergers’. The upshot of mergers once you cut
through the glam and hype of how wonderful everything is because it is new was
tens of thousands of college places lost.
Consider this, the bulk of college places go to working
class kids, but you must also mention, foreign students use this as a gateway
to university, along with middle class kids who didn’t get the grades! Higher education
or university education is operated on a class system, yes, there are many
working class kids in it, but their numbers are dwarfed by the middle classes
from private schools. In subjects like medicine, veterinary medicine and
dentistry, you will generally have to look very hard to find the students from
disadvantaged backgrounds. Having spent 20 years at Glasgow University ,
I saw first hand the make up of the student population which changed little
from a working class perspective. There were ‘changes’ but it was noticeable
when it was done when the University was targeting foreign students. In the mid
80’s when I arrived, there was a healthy Norwegian contingent because of Oil
and engineering, later years a huge influx of Chinese students.
In Court minutes as far back as 20 years go, the University of Glasgow decided to increase their intake
of students from foreign backgrounds. Why the interest in teaching foreign
students, basically money, universities were raking in cash to the tune of £25k
a year from them. In recent years, as people noticed that EU students were
getting free tuition, people clicked that this largesse worked against working
class kids.
But this would be yet again, a symptom, of a problem never
addressed.
The greatest lie of free tuition is that it is free, the
bulk of the population which is working class over the years is paying for it and
effectively frozen out of it. The current exams fiasco of downgrading working
class kids to mere ‘second class citizens’ isn’t new. It is just a different
style of discrimination on a massive scale, and it is just getting an airing
because what the SNP have done under Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney. Their
actions were so heinous that even their own SNP supporters and the press are up
in arms. Today, the spotlight is focused on the SQA, but what has happened here
is a symptom; a real part of the illness is the SFC, the Scottish Funding
Council. This organisation should be split into two separate bodies, one for
universities and the other for colleges, but it won’t. You see politicians like to talk about how
much they are spending on education, which is billions, but not who they spend
it on.
A brief glimpse of the make up of Holyrood MSPs you can see
most of the them have a degree from university, and a cosy relationship with
them, they have no interest of changing the status quo to give disadvantaged
kids a level playing field. When they talk about letting more working class
kids in, the narrative they use is ‘lowering the bar’, basically saying the
working class kids are ‘thick’, and the press and politicians, they generally
don’t say anything in protest.
Working class kids don’t need the bar lowered for them; they
need the same help that rich kids get. Pre covid, you take a walk into the
Mitchell library and you could see kids from private schools getting extra help
with paid tutors, pretty much every day.
Where was the level playing field which politicians were
suppose to provide?
Have you ever considered the concept that the State school
system isn’t there to provide educational opportunities beyond a certain point?
You are living in a world of passive discrimination which is
socially acceptable to the political classes. Politicians keep saying they are
trying to fix these issues, but they never tackle the people who do
discriminate, have you never noticed that? Name one person dismissed from a university
appointment for discrimination. I suspect you can’t name one, never read it in
a paper, never saw it one a news programme because the university protects
them, and in turn for covering up, they protect themselves, the politicians
ignore it unless it is a ‘cause celeb’ to boost their election chances to
either get into office or stay in office.
Today, while we are still in the maelstrom of the SQA fight,
something caught my eye, and it should get you thinking as well, establishments
are being asked to ring-fence degree places for college students to help open
up fresh opportunities for a university education to thousands of the Scotland 's most
disadvantaged in the post-Covid economy. When you look at who is offering this
apparent ‘help’, you really need to ask, three questions, who, why and when. A
new report released today in a college and university collaboration apparently sets
out a series of recommendations to create more opportunities for students to
progress seamlessly between a Higher National (HN) qualification into a university
degree.
It should be pointed out that this already exists; it is not
unknown that people who have taken an HND at college would enter university
either at second or third year depending on their course or assessment of their
ability. As to who came up with reinventing the wheel, is it produced by the
National Articulation Forum; who are made up by people from Colleges Scotland and
Universities Scotland. If you are the curious type, look up who funds Universities
Scotland, then who runs this organisation; then check their linkedin background
to see where they came from.
Universities Scotland
is a mouthpiece organisation for universities!
When I read their proposals of what is effectively re-organising
the deckchairs, I have to ask where these alleged extra thousands of the Scotland 's most
disadvantaged kids are going to pop up from. This measure looks rather to me to
be a housekeeping measure to help clear out those already in the system earlier
and make them look good because if the grades fiasco doesn’t pan out, then they
have already got their ‘story; ready about helping, especially when they start
rejecting people. If you take what these people say as gospel for a minute,
they are really admitting that under the current system, thousands of working
class kids who are disadvantaged where further disadvantaged by them regardless
of grades.
How many decades have they known the system is broken; and
if they only spotted this now in 2020, what does that say about the current
state of management in education? How can people have faith in a system, which
people on the outside know is flawed but those on the inside choose to do
nothing of note to fix it. A real gem which you should look at is Higher education establishments
are being asked to give a guarantee of places for college students on
undergraduate and graduate apprenticeship degrees. I don’t like ‘ring-fencing’
when it comes to people, because when you stick in quotas based on things like
social class, you just condoning the discrimination of the past, and green
lighting the discrimination of the future. Of course, many will be taken in by
the rhetoric, extra places for thousands of disadvantaged kids, but truth is,
given the system was setup to fail poor kids, how much faith can we have in the
same people who failed us all before and the politicians who failed to act
unless pressurised?
Are we to simply believe they have had an epiphany?
Also, another cracker to hone in on is that the forum say
they have not included timescales for change "as the expectation" is
for colleges, universities, the Scottish Government and other organisations
"to progress them as a matter of importance".
This is the admission in my opinion of ‘no change’, because
there is no commitment, no will, no ambition and no urgency to change the
status quo.
Having seen the SNP Government of 13 years fail the poorest
in society from the get go, given we have seen a lack of action for decades and
decades, who is kidding who about anyone attaching importance to this? The
reason that universities and colleges are squealing like they have got their ‘tits
in a wringer’ is that foreign student numbers are expected to fall sharply as
liken to ‘off a cliff’ due to covid. This creates a funding black hole, if
covid hadn’t happened, universities were able to pad out the university
population with £25k foreign students; this wouldn’t even be talked up as a
starter beyond previous middle class rhetoric of ‘we are trying to help the
poor’.
Lydia Rohmer, joint convener of the National Articulation
Forum and principal of West Highland College UHI said:
“Colleges and universities have been working in partnership
for many years to provide opportunities and pathways to enable students to make
the transition from college to university. The work of the Forum has been
invaluable in helping to provide focus on ways that colleges and universities
can enhance that provision and provide more opportunities for students to
progress towards their chosen careers. Articulation routes provide a valuable
pathway from college into university for many students, some of whom will have
already overcome significant barriers; therefore, it is important that the
routes are flexible, seamless, and provide equality of opportunity.
The recommendations encourage even closer working
relationships between colleges and universities – and indeed collective
leadership across the wider Scottish education system – to deliver fair,
equitable and sustainable pathways into university, and reducing any
unnecessary repetition of the learner journey.”
That being said, we know the numbers of students from the
most disadvantaged backgrounds still stinks, especially in places like St
Andrews. In January figures showed that 15.9 per cent of the intake in Scottish
higher education came from the most deprived 20 per cent of the population,
amounting to 5,210 students.
Ask yourself, how many universities and colleges are there in
Scotland ?
Then grasp this, Scottish Funding Council funds 19
universities and 26 colleges, you could take the 5,210 students and they would
make up one fifth of the total student population of the University of Glasgow .
To show how un-ambitious Nicola Sturgeon and her SNP Government
is; they want to increase the number of disadvantaged working class kids by a
measly 0.1%. From 15.9% to 16%, are you underwhelmed by this ambition? How does
this stack up against the SNP lie that they are Stronger for Scotland ? How
does this stack up with Nicola Sturgeon saying, ‘judge me on education’?
There is a whole sub industry in university education that
appears devoted to widening access, they get resources but in reality, they are
just the public face of a talking shop that isn’t credible in my opinion.
And never where!
All they do is ‘talk, talk, talk’ but in the main, they are
just educational social engineering tokenists. Their existence is to get you to
believe that you shouldn’t complain, you shouldn’t ask questions and shouldn’t
look further into this because these people are the education professionals. They
might have a two room office somewhere but it is low staffed and stuck away
somewhere in a university cupboard, maybe next to the coffee machine and
someone’s spotted owl collection. Occasionally, they might get to go out to a
school and do a presentation, unfurl some banners, do a power point
presentation and tell kids how wonderful their university experience will be.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said:
“Every child growing up in Scotland , regardless of their
background, should have an equal chance of attending university and
participating in higher education”.
Talk, talk, talk, too much talk and not enough action!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Like probably most people in Scotland, who are well past the college / University stage of life, your article is a real eye opener to the morass that has become of Scottish higher education under the SNP. I`m astounded by the revelations in your incisive article, however, I know I really shouldn`t be after all these years of SNP misrule.
ReplyDeleteHave you ever thought of running for this new Alliance for Unity party, as I`m sure someone of your insight and ability would be an asset for any political organisation in the fight against the SNP destroyers of all that was once good in Scotland.
Hi RMR
ReplyDeleteOne thing about me is that I notice things which others don't take in, later down the line, I point out these facts, like the University of Glasgow Court Minutes about increasing numbers of foreign students. Read this circa 20 years.
George
You reckon this is a turning point George?
ReplyDeleteJust wondering, what your point of view is on the following:
1) The "rise" in pro indy polls. Permanent tide or temporary thing?
2) The new Scottish Conservative leader, Douglas Ross. Any better than Carlaw?
3) Boris Johnson's new approach to barring Sturgeon from the cabinet. Good idea or recipe for disaster that'll fuel the nats?
"figures showed that 15.9 per cent of the intake in Scottish higher education came from the most deprived 20 per cent of the population" Terrible statistics but they fit well beside the life expectancy figures...drug deaths and suicides ect.
ReplyDeleteI remember working in the IT Dept of a certain well known Glasgow based large university, they were developing this new system for international students, I asked why and it was apparently to do with funding, they got so much cash from countries of mainly Chinese students and middle East students, all about the £££!
ReplyDeleteDear Anon
ReplyDelete1) The "rise" in pro indy polls. Permanent tide or temporary thing?
Given nothing remains upwards or static, we should see a peak, the downfall will be more in a post Sturgeon Scotland.
2) The new Scottish Conservative leader, Douglas Ross. Any better than Carlaw?
This remains to be seen, it also depends on how much the UK Govt is willing to get involved in Scotland, the new HQ is a start, I highlighted a bigger role for Scotland Office needed. I would also say a rolling programme of events for business and people needs, from public meetings to street stalls advertising services.
3) Boris Johnson's new approach to barring Sturgeon from the cabinet. Good idea or recipe for disaster that'll fuel the nats?
Good idea, if it was me, I would bar her from Cabinet, never visit her in Bute House, and if she wants something, only by appointment. If she plays her game of attempting to turn up late for a meeting with Boris, it would be simply cancelled.