Dear All
The Alex Salmond ‘show’, not the one on RT
but the piece of theatre being played out in the Courts and Press, like a steam
engine, this drama is building up steam gradually, but before you get carried
away, this is the ‘phoney war’ at present.
No shells of 105 mm have crossed the
battlefield, no one is dead yet career wise, a few people have been
shellshocked but everyone is still standing. Of course we haven’t seen much in
the way of ‘troop deployment’ yet either. One person who has decided to pop his
head up is Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA trade union which
represents senior civil servants. Penman has accused Alex Salmond of 'personal
vendetta' against top civil servant, Leslie Evans.
It may seem to many or a few that Leslie
Evans, Nicola Sturgeon’s handpicked choice for the top civil service job is a ‘proxy’
for attacking Sturgeon.
Isn’t it awful when ‘best buddies’ fall
out?
Yesterday Salmond attempted to do his ‘Lady
Diana’ after winning his victory, he expressed regret dressed in black, but he
couldn’t sustain it. In a roller coaster of emotions, he went from sorrow to
attack mode and called for Leslie Evans to quit over
the "unlawful" way the Scottish Government dealt with
sexual misconduct complaints against him. It was an unremarkable performance
but a warning shot across the bows that, ‘if you wrong us, shall we not revenge’.
Of course, this bit is from the Merchant of Venice but clearly it rather seems
that Alex Salmond wants his ‘pound of flesh’.
Perhaps several pounds!
An interesting take on this drama can be
found at the Craig Murray blog.
If you were to do a list of people who
appear to owe a ‘pound of flesh’, you might come up with this list.
Nicola Sturgeon
Leslie Evans
Judith Mackinnon
Who is Judith Mackinnon, she is ‘Head of
People Advice’ at the Scottish Government, she allegedly cost the Scottish
Government a whopping £500,000. She was previously Head of Human Resource
Governance at the Scottish Police Authority according to Craig Murray’s
article. A senior policeman allegedly told Murray that appeared in practice to
mean professional feminist. Someone else who was also at the Scottish Police
Authority as a board member was SNP Minister Jeane Freeman.
Yesterday also saw Nicola Sturgeon on the
back foot while being interviewed on TV, it seemed the wind had been taken
right out of her sails by the collapse of this case by her side throwing in the
towel. Judge Lord Pentland declared that the Scottish Government's actions were
"unlawful in respect that they were procedurally unfair and that they were
tainted with apparent bias".
Reading the explanation put forward by
Craig Murray, one has to wonder about the future of both Leslie Evans and Judith
Mackinnon. Murray’s take is that their position appear to be untenable, but
just as Evans is a buffer for Sturgeon, Mackinnon is a buffer for Evans. There
was talk of starting the whole process again but given what has transpired,
many would say that the ‘window’ for action is gone via the Scottish Government
route.
Everything down the tubes because the person
who investigated the complaints had some involvement with the two women prior
to being appointed investigating officer!
Craig Murray uses the rather catchy title, “The
Salmond Stitch-Up – the Incredible Facts, and why Mackinnon and Evans Must Be
Sacked”.
I would have added in Nicola Sturgeon’s
name but I am all about ‘belts and braces’.
Salmond repeatedly calls for Evans to quit
her post is victors revenge, he demanded:
"When she has got some time for mature
reflection, I hope that the Permanent Secretary considers her position."
I think not, Evans has time, it would take
quite a few years before Salmond could affect the employment of Evans, even if
he could return to front line politics, by that time, Evans could be sitting on
a beach with her golden goodbye pension sipping Evian water.
Back to Mr Penman, he said:
"I think what has been disappointing
is the way Alex Salmond has continually targeted Leslie Evans from day one on
this case, he's called it the 'Leslie Evans procedure'. Yesterday he made repeated
assertions that she should resign. He has always portrayed this as a personal
vendetta, even going as far as suggesting the Civil Service was acting without
ministerial authority, so it was no surprise yesterday that Alex Salmond would
therefore call for Leslie Evans' resignation."
He added:
"Confidence in the Permanent Secretary
is a matter for the First Minister. I'm sure when Alex Salmond was first
minister that is what he would have said and I don't think anyone could be in
any doubt from what Nicola Sturgeon said yesterday that Leslie Evans
retains the confidence of the First Minister."
Yesterday Nicola Sturgeon said that Ms
Evans took the decision to settle the court case "with my support".
Do you see why Nicola Sturgeon should be on
the ‘pound of flesh’ list?
Nicola Sturgeon maybe at present ‘standing by’
Evans but given how quick she abandoned her mentor Salmond, I wouldn’t count on
Sturgeon’s support. You can almost see the storm brewing the ranks of the SNP,
Nicola Sturgeon rammed her ‘women’s agenda’ down the throat of the SNP, the
Government and anywhere else she could, and look how it ended up.
Finally, there is an ongoing police
investigation; Salmond has admitted no wrongdoing or criminality. It seems almost
a foregone conclusion that if Salmond gets back into the SNP, he would want to
challenge for the leadership, then become First Minister again.
Is there room at the Cabinet table for Nicola
Sturgeon?
I would hazard a guess and say only
temporary till he gets his feet under the table and he moves his own people
into power, then we could see a Stalin like era of the purges, the backbenches being
the ‘new Siberia’.
‘If you wrong us, shall we not revenge’!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow
University
Hopefully it's going to be a very public spat with lots of leaking on both sides george.
ReplyDeleteWe will have to see how this pans out Freddy
ReplyDeleteCuriously Judge Lord Pentland was appointed by Alex Salmond!
ReplyDeleteSurely he should have recused himself from hearing the case, lest anyone accuse him of being biased!
However as we know the Scottish legal system is a small and cosy world.
It may also explain why it’s taking so long to get Natalie McGarry anywhere near a courtroom.
As if she lived in a scheme, her case would have been done and dusted by now!
From Wiki - I hope this helps
ReplyDeleteIn September 2016, McGarry gave a voluntary interview with Police Scotland.[24] Following this interview, McGarry was charged with a number of fraud offences (including embezzlement of funds, breach of trust and an offence under the Scottish Independence Referendum Act 2013) relating to apparent discrepancies in the finances of the SNP Glasgow Regional Association and Women for Independence.[4][24] McGarry was initially represented by solicitor Aamer Anwar, but changed representation subsequently.[25] She denies all wrongdoing.[4][24]
She appeared in private at Glasgow Sheriff Court on 21 March 2018. [26]