Dear All
In case you missed it, the Political Studies Association are
in Glasgow a holding a conference, some big names from the world of politics
are attending to enlighten the academics. There is a question and answer
session with Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC MP, whether there is value to that event,
I leave it up to you.
One of the range of topics which might have perked your
interest was ‘The (Dis)United Kingdom in Interesting Times’, the main point is
the desire by people for sovereignty, the issue of populism is high on the
people’s agenda, they don’t want politicians tell them how to live their lives.
The new political landscape is seeing old parties effectively dying off,
because they have no place in today’s society, it is very much a rejection of control
freakery.
Yesterday, I blogged on how Scottish Labour’s problems,
their task to recover is so huge and so time consuming, their current modus
operandi is just not worth salvaging. Fixing Scottish Labour is an entire
project all in itself, and to be clear when I read this:
I am not interest in the leak, whoever did that was stupid,
what I am more interested in is the claim that in a debate, it is more
important to present a pretence of a united front than allow others of
different opinion to state another view. If democracy is about anything, the
use of debate and alternatives views in a party is a sign of health.
This is why Scottish Labour will not progress, the same
people who brought the party to its knees are more keen to fireguard their own
positions by use of authority than allowing Scottish Labour to grow. Just as we
have seen in England , we
will see in Scotland ,
the emergence of two Labour Parties within the same organisation.
A small point on the SNP, they are already doomed, they don’t
tolerate other voices in their ranks as seen by the comments from MSPs calling
to challenge Nicola Sturgeon, please note the people doing so are at the end of
their careers. In the SNP, selection isn’t based on merit, it is based on cronyism
and promoting people with no ability to threaten the leadership.
Anyway back to the Political Studies Association in Glasgow , if you haven’t
heard about them or their conference, don’t worry it isn’t cheap to go and
attend;
Standard Rates
Member = £235
Postgraduate Member = £125
Non-member = £320
Postgraduate Non-member = £165
Member = £235
Postgraduate Member = £125
Non-member = £320
Postgraduate Non-member = £165
Gulp!
They are also handing out volt power banks for free with
their names of them as a freebie, I got one, you never know, it might come in
handy. The big thing about events like these is listening to the conferences
talks, networking and quizzing the academics afterwards.
One of the speakers at the Political Studies Association event
in Glasgow was unpopular Nicola Sturgeon,
apparently if she ever gets her way and achieves an independent Scotland ,
she thinks that Holyrood will need more MSPs.
Pre-devolution, we had 59 MPs to represent the interests of Scotland and
its voters, now in this day in age, we have 59 MPs and 129 MSPs to do the same
job, so either we didn’t have proper representation pre Holyrood or now we have
too much representation. The problem with representation now is a political
class divorce from the needs of the public; this is shown by the election
results. If Scotland
is on a journey, it isn’t towards independence, it seems to me that the journey
for Scots is to find new political parties who can meet the challenges that
voters face in their every day lives…. and still do the day job of government.
Sturgeon’s call for more MSPs in my opinion is a lifeline to
a load of cretins that she and others would which to foster on us to give them
a payday.
Would under Nicola Sturgeon each ward have an MSP?
Would under Nicola Sturgeon a constituency be broken down
into two wards which would seem more practical so that an MSP would have 45,000
voters?
Would there still be a list system to top up?
What would the effect be on local government and councillors?
How many new MSPs would be needed in total?
So, there is a lot of questions that Sturgeon’s suggestion
throws up about how governance is enacted in Scotland if the SNP could ever
managed to trick the people into voting for her nightmare.
I don’t believe that Nicola Sturgeon’s case holds water, if there
is a case for needing more representation then it seems obvious that increasing
the staff of MSPs would be a better solution, more productive and cost
effective. The Holyrood Parliament for years has rightly been seen as a very
poor second to Westminster which led to many people claiming that the place was
filled with third rate politicians in a second rate parliament.
And the standard of legislation and debate is suspect, has
Holyrood made people’s lives better?
Do you feel that you live in the highest tax place in the UK is better?
Do you see the streets lined with gold or do you see what I
see homeless people living rough, abandoned to their fate, the SNP concerned more
about middle class welfare-ism to deliver an election victory?
Gimmicks and low grade pap is served up to the public with
the expectance of there should be universal applause and gratitude for the
delivery of so little done by so many.
The most pressing reform I want to see at Holyrood is the
complete removal of the list system as the most undemocratic piece of nonsense
ever invented.
The public have no way to remove a bad list MSP.
Not even given the option via the ballot box.
Holyrood is designed to create a false air that democracy
works; it allows people who the public would never consider to be allowed to
make laws because of a rigged system.
Just because it is rigged legally doesn’t hold water, the
list system is a scandal that plagues Holyrood since it opened in 1999.
As well as throwing a lifeline to the SNP’s cult members
currently not MSPs, Sturgeon managed to get in her current grievance on Brexit
and her wish of getting a vote permitted on her preferred timetable for a second
Scottish independence referendum.
She can whistle for that agenda, Brexit is rolling, the
letter’s in and the talking has started. Speaking of talking, did you know that
the SNP have had about 80 discussions with people and officials in Europe about SNP membership?
80 discussions, no headway, nothing achieved, no objectives
reached, no progress.
If there is a vote and the SNP position is a choice between
the UK and the EU, the
people will back the UK , the
loss by the SNP will be greater because the UK is a country and the EU is a
political organisation which is falling apart.
European people like the people of the UK want to rediscover their sovereignty again,
they want control of their laws, full control, they want to freely trade, they
like the UK
don’t want a political elite dictating to them. They are just starting their
journey, their awakening; it will take time to see the mainstream parties in Europe start the process of failing to accrue votes.
Their downward spiral will need a tipping point; the vehicle
which will probably usher this in will be terrorism. At some point, there will
be an event so huge that the national psyche of a country will be affected
which will see a political party collapse. In Scotland , we witnessed a collapse
of Scottish Labour, independence was the banner but lack of social justice was
the driving force. Sustained pressure built up against Scottish Labour to a
point when the collapse came it was pretty much total.
In a political sense the demise of Scottish Labour was due
to their complete disconnect from the public and their problems. They wrongly
thought that the public would continue to allow them to take them for granted
as they pushed their agenda and not a people’s agenda onto voters.
Finally, Nicola Sturgeon told the Political Studies
Association annual conference, that EU membership had been a “significant
issue” in the 2014 independence referendum.
What utter delusional rubbish!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
shakes head
ReplyDeleteSo the First Minister believes an independent Scotland would require more MSP's! Judging by Holyroods current record She has is obviously prepared to ignore the military maxim - "NEVER reinforce failure"
ReplyDeleteSturgeon and her feral little Anglophobic mob is as much use as tits on a snake, George.
ReplyDelete'the public has no way to remove a bad list MSP' - How true George. The public record of some of them such as adultery, being investigated for misuse of public funds, failing to turn up at parliament which received a 'censor', telling all in parly that their are anti-Scottish if they do not support Scottish Independence, making statements that colleagues in parly were ill-advised by voting for Brexit, claiming £177 for two meals for self, biscuits, coffee and tea at all meetings and even toilet rolls, yes, toilet rolls. It makes me sick that our country has fallen into the hands of such vacuous and disgusting people who are gorging themselves at the top table and giving the rest of us the finger sign. You are right the list system should be scrapped together with the present political system which deliberately causes upheaval and trouble instead of peace and security. I am ashamed of the present Scottish government but cannot see them being kicked out soon.
ReplyDeleteWhy would we need more list SNP MSPs when Keith Brown is on the tv telling us how the new forth bridge is progressing then he's on telling the public how theM8 motorway will be opened soon,is that not the job of the transport minister Humsa Usless a list MSP who is so incompetent he can't even get his car insurance sorted and gets fined in court,and sturgeon wants more arsholes.
ReplyDeleteHumza Yousaf
ReplyDeleteis not a list MSP he was voted in by a huge majority and George Laird knows that
Dear Anon
ReplyDelete"Humza Yousaf" is not a list MSP he was voted in by a huge majority and George Laird knows that".
What has your comment got to do with the post?
As to your claim of a huge majority, the SNP got 15,316 out of about circa 60,000 possible votes, so roughly 25% of the people eligible to vote in Pollok wanted an SNP Candidate, but I don't see that lasting ...do you?
I don't call 25% a ringing endorsement given an entire political party behind him.
George