Dregs of humanity: Nicola Sturgeon refuses to rule out readmitting Michelle Thomson to the SNP, this toxic scandal goes right to the heart of ethics in politics, time to throw this line at Sturgeon, “How many vulnerable people have elected SNP members ripped off today Nicola, how many of them were cancer victims”?

Dear All

SNP MP Michelle Thomson currently a toxic independent MP is the gift that keeps on giving, having sunk her own career, the aftermath is that she is sinking and damaging the careers of SNP cabinet ministers who endorsed her business record.

Unpopular Nicola Sturgeon has refused to rule out readmitting the Edinburgh West MP to her party when so many question her suitability to hold public office after the morality of her business affairs.

Sturgeon is the worst type of leader, common with no class, a little lower middle class immoral wretched creature who is destroying Scotland’s reputation, piece by piece, day by day.

I have said it before and I will say it again, the Scottish National Party is a party of the rich, run by the rich for the benefit of the rich.

The SNP were supposed to represent the new politics, people wanted change in Scotland and thought the SNP were that change, how wrong they were.

We know that there will be a Police Scotland investigation, but another interesting piece of fall out is the role of the Law Society of Scotland who have also been damaged, hence an emergency press conference to defend its delays in referring key information to the Crown Office.

The Law Society will probably be talked about more in the future in the press as the Police investigation and presumably a court case comes down the track.

Who knows who, who knew what and how they are all connected with certainly mulled over with a fine tooth comb! The Society has had to strongly deny speculation that a pro-independence campaigner, Lawyers for Yes punter, who served on the committee responsible for passing the case to prosecutors, may have held up the process.

Michelle Thomson's property dealings from what is in the public domain have caused massive concern, so much so that Thomson herself is damaged beyond repair, for her the SNP cannot take her back. Thomson built a £1.7 million property portfolio by purchasing homes from people in financial distress.

Is that the hallmark of a social justice campaigner?

Is that the ethics of the new SNP politics?

Is that someone who cares about Scotland?

Alex Neil, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, said Thomson had an "excellent grasp of the economic picture" and "commitment to how business can be used to support social justice."

I wonder if Alex Neil now bitterly regrets saying those words in the light that a cancer sufferer was one of the people affected by this scandal.

And let’s be clear, it is a scandal.

Fiona Hyslop, the gaffe prone Culture Secretary who deserves to be removed as a minister described Thomson as an "ideal candidate" for Westminster. Ideal because in the mind of Hyslop, because Thomson had a "knowledge of business, and her passion to make Scotland a better place."

To quote Nicola Sturgeon:

“Bollocks”!

Angela Constance; dubbed by some in the SNP as ‘Alice Cooper in drag’ was quick to praise Ms Thomson's track record during the referendum. I remember Angela Constance from Glasgow University, she was in the SRC and she was a clown.

She is still a clown.

For me although, he isn’t senior in the SNP, the best laugh was Jim Sillars, the former SNP deputy leader, he wrongly endorsed her "commitment to social justice and how we can support the poorest in our society."

Sillars is waking up to the grim reality, Scotland wants change and the SNP aren’t it, sure Thomson is in the firing now, but the SNP is a cult full of people who aren’t the right people to take Scotland forward.

It seems that questions aren’t just being directed towards Nicola Sturgeon, people are getting the idea that her husband Peter Murrell needs more light shone on him.   

Labour Leader Kezia Dugdale said:

"What we have here are vulnerable families losing out for the financial gain of others. Vulnerable people were taken advantage of as their homes were snapped up at knock down prices. That’s just not right”.

No, it isn’t right; in fact it stinks so bad that Thomson should be a campaign issue for the Holyrood election.

Let Nicola Sturgeon explain why vulnerable families lost out for the financial gain of others, let her justify this to the poor of Scotland who she had already is in the process of robbing them of their right to buy their council house.

Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson:

"These are very serious questions in relation to ethics and morality, especially for a party which so shamelessly regards itself as worldly superior to everyone else. Surely the First Minister can agree no senior spokesperson should exploit the poor and vulnerable in this way, and that anyone who does has no future in the party."

I would like to see the people that front ‘community justice’ dog Sturgeon on the campaign trail scream:

“How many vulnerable people have elected SNP members ripped off today Nicola, how many of them were cancer victims”?

I guess we will be seeing a lot of photos of Nicola with kids for the foreseeable future, the poorer the better, a human shield to protect a wretched individual who is unworthy of leadership, let alone government.

“How many vulnerable people have elected SNP members ripped off today Nicola, how many of them were cancer victims”?

Yours sincerely

George Laird

The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University