Dear All
The Scottish National Party is a cult, as such it is devoid
of original thinking, there is no in depth policy beyond soundbite and gestures
politics. The ‘act’ by the SNP is grudge, grievance and malcontent in various
forms of complaint. At the head of the SNP sits a ‘cult’ leader who the
‘dafties’ and clique surround as some kind of guru, the Nationalists base their
leadership round the cult of the personality.
The last guru was Scotland’s ‘jolly fat man’ Alex Salmond,
he led his assorted rabble which he managed to cobble to together up to the top
of the hill during independence and then unceremoniously had to march them back
down in failure.
A few posts ago, I wrote a post saying the ‘coast is clear’;
this was to do with the new Nuclear submarine HMS Artful being stationed at
Faslane. The MoD isn’t what people would describe as risk takers, but they do
know a safe bet when they see it. The independence question has been settled
for a generation, all talk of indyref 2 is meaningless pap to convince the
‘dafties’ to keeping providing cheap labour to the SNP Cult members to get them
elected.
Nicola Sturgeon is a clown.
Do you know how to deal with a clown?
The first thing to remember is that a clown wants you to
play their game, chase after them; then they attempt to appear to be reasonable
as they increasingly make stupid demands.
When you stubbornly refuse to play their silly games, they
become more animated and ridiculous, instead of playing their game, they are
playing yours.
Nicola Sturgeon has threatened to cause trouble over the Scotland
Bill, if David Cameron doesn’t agree to be held to ransom by what Sturgeon
calls a 'fair' share of cash. The threat is that Sturgeon would use the SNP
Government to derail the Conservatives' flagship Scotland Bill.
How do you solve this problem?
Quite simple, you let the ‘train’ continue to pick up speed
while giving the pretence of having meaningful dialogue, then you just stand
back and let it hit the buffers because you calculate the time factor of the
point of implosion.
Sturgeon says she is willing to launch a constitutional war
with Westminster ,
in business, you make a low offer then let them ‘beat’ you up to the offer you
already had in mind, however in this case, I would go in with an offer of no
extra cash. That wouldn’t be to the detriment of Scotland because it would be pound
for pound what is available at present.
The Conservatives might for political advantage sweeten the
pot because they might think that 2016 could be their breakthrough year in Scotland . That
isn’t going to happen politically, you see the Conservatives haven’t climb
their particular mountain with the Scottish people. In 2015 at the Westminster election,
they lost some of their vote share. And just like in business, you have to make
people an offer, in their case their offer given past experience wouldn’t
amount to much. The Scottish Conservatives need to put more on the table not
for the Scottish Government but for the Scottish people but that probably won’t
happen.
Ruth Davidson talks about being the ‘alternative’, but a
weak offer isn’t much to pick at, let alone vote for, it isn’t powers that
Scottish people are sitting about brooding over, its fairness.
Fairness!
I read Professor Adam Tomkins blog, he is standing in Glasgow
Anniesland in 2016; the Conservative vote is going down in his backyard. He
probably will top the Glasgow
list, it seems that David Meikle; the sole Tory Councillor on Glasgow Council
isn’t getting the spot vacated by Ruth Davidson. He might know a lot about
Constitution law but he doesn’t know a lot about campaigning. Tomkins has
already lost Glasgow Anniesland, you see Mr. Tomkins doesn’t understand that
campaigning is like puppies, they aren’t just for Xmas; they are an all year
events.
And a few selfies posted on twitter a campaign does not
make!
New tax and welfare powers are coming to Holyrood making it one
of the most powerful parliaments in the world; this is part of the
Conservatives ‘strategic disengagement’ from Scotland . The Labour Party in Scotland has serious problems as the Westminster election has
shown them. A cull of MPs who were under performing was needed and didn’t
happen, so the public disillusioned stepped up to the plate and did the job
that Labour should have done internally. There was a mood in the country for
change, the SNP was used to force that change on the Labour Party.
Depending what and who you are reading regarding the
political situation on both sides of the border, you may be very tempted to
think that the United
Kingdom is heading towards federalism? This
would benefit Conservatives in England
for some considerable time due to the numbers game in Westminster , but it may not be healthy for
democracy.
Surely no one is that stupid?
Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson said:
“The Scottish Parliament has to turn its attention to the
powers over which we have control – from the education of our children and the
laws under which our justice system is run, to the state of our NHS. These
powers are huge in scope - and over the next year this must become the clear
centre of our politics in Scotland .
In short, it is time this Scottish Government focussed 100 per cent on the day
job.”
Ruth Davidson says she is the ‘alternative’ and she is
‘radical’, okay, lets see her put in her manifesto the pledge to campaign for a
totally devolved Scottish Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).
As to Sturgeon’s threat, I would call her bluff, and if she
refused to take the powers, I would scrap the Scotland Bill, and then never
mention it again, there is no downside because the people who voted to stay
part of the UK
won’t travel towards Sturgeon and her vile nasty vicious clique.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
I don't sense any crisis. Cameron has committed to "the vow" and I am sure it will be delivered. Actually it is a solid indication of the weakness of Sturgeon's position that she tries to create a "constitutional crisis" in an attempt to put pressure on Cameron. This does not create any sort of crisis for the UK. However it does put Sturgeon in a position where she will, potentially, approach the Holyrood election with no manifesto commitment to another referendum whilst simultaneously refusing to accept the new powers recommended by the Smith commission. What she is doing is her usual half arsed attempt at facing in two different directions simultaneously by claiming she will use the new powers "creatively and wisely" whilst vilifying a financial settlement which hasn't even been defined. The same job she has done by demanding votes for 16 and 17 year olds whilst also wanting to appoint named persons to protect them from harm. I fully expect the UK government to ignore her bullshit and leave her to decide whether or not to actually refuse the powers and watch her activists jump ship.
ReplyDeleteHi Auld Jock
ReplyDeleteNicola Sturgeon is playing a game, and Cameron shouldn't play her game.
George
BEAUTIFUL summing up Georgieboy , if only you were in power
ReplyDeleteCrookie
Auld Jock. Sturgeon obviously doesn't pay attention to history - you never, ever fight on two fronts simultaneously.
ReplyDeleteThe downfall for the SNP will be a combination of the Named Person and Data Sharing bills. I also think she's in for a surprise with the EU referendum. If Scots vote 50/50 on that issue, then all her bullshit will blow in her face.
Cameron is not going to agree to a second referendum. Not now that he is spending £500million on Faslane.
The SNP are still playing the division card. But it's wearing off now. All we get is demands for this, that and everything, while blaming others for their own failures. In Health, the only positive thing Sturgeon managed was to keep Monklands Hospital open.
I really hope Corbyn wins the Labour leadership election. Simply because Sturgeon will jump into the political bed with him.
As all Sturgeon does is go on taxpayer funded jollies, has her photo taken with kids, blames Westminster for everything, says how wonderful the NATS are doing, and that's about it,,, ohh, and still no word of refunding the taxpayer over T in the Park.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure Cameron won't be for running after her George. He should in fact call her bluff, we will all be paying for this via whatever new tax rates they decide to impose. The only upside is that it should help wean people away from them.
ReplyDelete