Dear Oh Yes
“By condemning certain Yes campaigners as
'cheats' and 'vile people' you belittle your argument”.
To counter your claim, type into Google
‘SNP Vote rigging’, stop reading and do that now.
What did you see?
It is plain to see that there are people in
the SNP who are cheats.
I trust that addresses that point since
there are numerous examples.
Now go read this:
That should address the issue of vile
(Humza Yousaf’s wife).
And I can also draw on personal experience
to my conclusions that certain Yes campaigners are 'cheats' and 'vile people',
for example on twitter, check out @GeorgeMLaird, a fake twitter account sent up
by a Yes supporter (who you just defended). This account calls me a rapist, a
homosexual, a paedophile and homophobic.
Do I have cause to be “splenetic”?
Followers of that account included, Shona
McAlpine who works for Muslim SNP list MSP Humza Yousaf, Jonathan Mackie, SNP
Candidate and Yes Scotland, and Anniesland SNP, an official SNP branch. They
aren’t followers anymore and I informed the Police which led to the arrest of ‘GeorgeMLaird’.
So far, what have you discovered, let me
enlighten you, most of the people named all know Nicola Sturgeon personally and
she knows them by name.
“No matter what side of the political fence
you find yourself on, if you wish to be taken seriously as a commentator I
suggest you temper your language”.
Thank you for that, so far having been a
guest on the BBC, also invited to be in their audiences and been published
elsewhere I don’t think my writing has had the effect you think it has to my
detriment. I do moderate it elsewhere out of respect for other people sensibilities.
I can be blunt, then have you never heard of the harsh truth?
“I'm afraid your vitriol says more about you than it does about your views. I imagine your splenetic diatribe will probably have the opposite effect on your readers to the one you are hoping for”.
I can be blunt, then have you never heard of the harsh truth?
“I'm afraid your vitriol says more about you than it does about your views. I imagine your splenetic diatribe will probably have the opposite effect on your readers to the one you are hoping for”.
Well; given my readership ranges on average
between 8,000 to 10,000 people a month depending on material; I can afford the
odd loss. Oh, and recently I was told by a senior Glasgow Labour Councillor
that I am well read, also by someone in the SNP, so don’t hold your breath.
“BTW a fair minded person would publish
this response”.
Really, that is just an assumption on your
part!
I consider myself generally fair, however
there does come a point when a line is crossed.
Given you say I am not capable of fairness;
hence by your diatribe of “By condemning certain Yes campaigners as 'cheats'
and 'vile people' you belittle your argument”, we must switch the spotlight back
onto you and ask the same question.
Why prior to writing this diatribe didn’t
you do the appropriate research? Why aren’t you condemning certain Yes
campaigners as 'cheats' and 'vile people'? Why do you need to be led by the nose
to facts?
Finally, Alex Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and
Peter Murrell (her husband) are rats who don’t stand for fairness, equality and
social justice, are you willing to accept my word or do I have to reference AGAIN
for you.
Or would you like to take this time to do appropriate
research to update your skills!
I publish the inconvenient truth and don't see why I should doff my cap to these people who are trash!
I publish the inconvenient truth and don't see why I should doff my cap to these people who are trash!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow
University
Well said George.
ReplyDeleteexcellent blog.