Dear All
Have you ever been conned?
It is really annoying, so check out
Scotland’s unpopular Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s really intelligence
insulting rubbish.
Ms. Sturgeon says that new naval warships
could still be built in Scotland even if it leaves the UK.
So what power does she have to make that
statement?
Only the power of speech!
That’s right; her statement is completely
vacuous, devoid of fact and based on pure speculation and assumption.
In trying to get her ‘flagship’ campaign
off the rocks Nicola Sturgeon rejects suggestions that a vote for independence means
shipyards on the Clyde in Glasgow would lose out on work to build Type 26
warships.
Britain hasn’t built a military warship
outside the UK in 50 years; it isn’t just the issue of national security but
the reality of politics at the Westminster Village.
Yesterday, BAE announced 1,775 jobs are to
go across the UK, it isn’t what people wanted to hear but the good news is that
Govan and Scotstoun are to be saved but with a reduced work force.
The UK Government has ended shipbuilding at
Portsmouth, however, in the event of a Yes Vote; Portsmouth would be brought
back online and fairly quickly.
The yards at Govan and Scotstoun will both work
on the new Type 26 thus ensuring the continuation of the yards, the type 26 orders are vital.
The rub is that UK Government ministers
have hinted this work could go elsewhere if Scots vote Yes. What they are doing
is more than dropping hints, they are laying on the line, and for those
interested in protecting jobs they should be aware that Scotland’s unpopular
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon can save a single job.
So far Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon
have made in the region of £32 billion in spending pledges as they attempt to
buy Scottish votes.
Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael who
is less subtle than Michael Moore said the UK would not want the work to go to Scotland
if Scotland became independent and Portsmouth could be "well placed"
for the contract.
Shipbuilding is ending at Portsmouth but
they are still keeping key personnel on, that isn’t out of fondness for them,
it is a strategic move both from a defence and politic stand point.
Mr Carmichael said:
''If Scotland is no longer part of the
country, then it's difficult to see how this work will go to Scotland.''
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said: '
'The UK has never outside of the two world
wars built complex warships outside the UK."
He added:
"I see no reason to expect that the UK
would want to change from the position that we will build complex warships in
the UK for reasons of maintaining sovereign capability in the future.''
So, there you have it, why should the rest
of the UK place orders in what would be a foreign country?
It just won’t happen.
Sturgeon insists the Clyde is the
"best place" for the new ships to be built; then she goes off and
says the Ministry of Defence had placed for military vessels to be built in
Korea.
This is a point that she has used before to
attempt to deceive voters, these vessels aren’t warships, Labour MP Anas Sarwar
pulled her up for attempt to mislead people on the BBC Big Debate Independence
special hosted by Isobel Fraser.
Sturgeon told the BBC:
"The Type 26, assuming MoD does decide
to go ahead, these ships will be built on the Clyde because - as BAE said
yesterday and the Defence Secretary said yesterday - it is the best place to
build them, because of the investment we've seen in these yards, because of the
skill mix and because of the value for money."
If Scotland is independent then the best
place to build them will be Portsmouth,that is the bottom line.
Sturgeon added:
"We are talking about a UK Government
that has put a military contract in Korea. It really does underline how
preposterous it is that a UK Government having an arrangement with Scotland
would be a perfectly credible and sensible thing to do."
This statement shows how incredibly
ignorant Ms. Sturgeon is, she was caught on trying to deceive people before and
patently she hasn’t learnt, she is treating Scottish people with utter
contempt.
She added:
"The practical point is Philip Hammond
and BAE said very clearly yesterday that the Clyde was the value for money
option."
The placing of these orders is as much a
political decision as a financial and she clearly thinks when she speaks that
she is speaking to an uninformed audience.
Gerald Vernon-Jackson, leader of Portsmouth
City Council condemned the decision to shut down the last remaining shipyard in
England.
You can understand his point of view, this
is a major blow for the Portsmouth area and nearly a 1,000 people who stand to
lose their jobs.
Portsmouth Conservative councillor Alistair
Thompson said:
''Many of those who I represent as a
councillor are hugely concerned that this decision has been taken for political
reasons because of the referendum in Scotland next year.''
I think he will find many on both sides of
the border who would agree with him, the UK Government have committed an act of
faith in making their decision to ensure that Scotland remains in the UK. In
the unlikely event of a Yes vote; Portsmouth would taken out of mothballs and
returned to shipbuilding.
No British warship has been built outside
the UK for 50 years and that policy will continue.
As to Scotland’s unpopular Deputy First
Minister Nicola Sturgeon using the con trick that she has already been caught
out using citing MOD having vessels built in Korea, these aren’t warships, they
are auxiliary vessels.
And in an independent Scotland, there isn’t
a guarantee that Scotland would win these contracts either.
The reality is that shipbuilding in
Scotland relies very heavily on the British Ministry of Defence, if independent,
Scotland would lose both Govan and Scotstoun.
As to the Sturgeon statement, “new naval
warships could still be built in Scotland even if it leaves the UK”, that isn’t
a guarantee, that isn’t a commitment, she doesn’t speak for the British
Government.
It’s time to end the con!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow
University
That's why for S N P read Say anything do anything for your vote party.
ReplyDeleteThis is a nice awkward question asked by a chap called "Steve Turner" on Scotland's Big Yes/No? Debate.
ReplyDeleteHe asks;-
"This Navy - it is 'Royal', is it not? Much like the Air Force and the Army...
Scotland - as far as I'm aware - will be retaining the sovereignty of the Queen (et al), who - by Royal command, I believe - asks her government(s) to provide the necessary defences for her sovereign states. No?
So, given that the defence forces are in place by Royal command (the Queen of England is also that of Scotland, Wales, and N. Ireland), why would there be any issue with placing orders for Navy vessels with another sovereign state, even if it was independent?"
Why not indeed?
Perhaps some people in Westminster politics are just trying to make political capital out of the shipyards. For shame!
Kindest regards,
David Milligan Lvss
I would like to challenge you on the use of "unpopular" when referring to Nicola Sturgeon. Ms Sturgeon has a higher approval rating that most of the pro-union politicians put together.
ReplyDeleteThe truth hurts doesn't it?
Kindest regards,
David Milligan Lvss
Dear David
ReplyDeleteThis may help you regarding Scotland's unpopular Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-24861936
Never saved a single job, how is that for evidence!!!!
Nicola will do it, Nicola will knock heads, Nicola's special, looks like they sat there did the usual and then blew her arse out the door.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University