Dear All
Conservative leader David Cameron has said politicians should play a role in helping develop parenting skills to try to build a "responsible society".
This harks back to John Major and his theme of family values which crashed and burned publicly when it transpired that was shagging Edwina Currie behind his wife’s back.
Cameron says what mattered most to a child's chances is "not the wealth of their upbringing but the warmth of their parenting".
In taking this road Cameron is refusing to pass the buck on to the most dysfunctional families, the problem is that across Britain there are social networks which deny the poor life chances.
These are run by the middle class who ensure that the ladders are pulled up preventing the poor from aspiring and attaining social mobility.
Cameron refuses to acknowledge the real problem.
He is calling for "Active intervention", the new Tory buzzword which is meaningless.
Cameron was attending an event launched by London Labour think tank Demos which is trying to reposition itself as a neutral think tank now Labour is heading for defeat at the ballot box.
Demos is trying to promote a theme which can be seen recently in their flawed Service Nation report which proposes forced labour as part of the British way of life.
The rich middle class political elite such as Cameron have helped create an underclass, now out of control; he and others are desperate to find measures to manage it.
Cameron isn’t speaking of/or tackling the middle class social networks which are the real problem.
Demos are suggesting that good parenting was more important than wealth in determining life chances.
That as anyone who studies corrupt Britain knows is a lie.
In waving away the issue of poverty like a fly, Cameron said;
"Of course there's a link between material poverty and poor life chances, but the full picture is that that link also runs through the style of parenting that children in poor households receive."
In other words it is the fault of the uneducated poor but we should remember that life chances of the wealthy have one thing in common, wealth; this is the key that opens doors.
What Cameron and the Tories want has nothing to do about helping the poorest in society.
As I have said, not one word about the social networks that operates in places such as universities which ensure the rich middle class get priority over the poor.
Why do you think they operate a system of interviewing to get into medical schools?
It is to exclude.
Try solving that with ‘good parenting’ skills Cameron!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Conservative leader David Cameron has said politicians should play a role in helping develop parenting skills to try to build a "responsible society".
This harks back to John Major and his theme of family values which crashed and burned publicly when it transpired that was shagging Edwina Currie behind his wife’s back.
Cameron says what mattered most to a child's chances is "not the wealth of their upbringing but the warmth of their parenting".
In taking this road Cameron is refusing to pass the buck on to the most dysfunctional families, the problem is that across Britain there are social networks which deny the poor life chances.
These are run by the middle class who ensure that the ladders are pulled up preventing the poor from aspiring and attaining social mobility.
Cameron refuses to acknowledge the real problem.
He is calling for "Active intervention", the new Tory buzzword which is meaningless.
Cameron was attending an event launched by London Labour think tank Demos which is trying to reposition itself as a neutral think tank now Labour is heading for defeat at the ballot box.
Demos is trying to promote a theme which can be seen recently in their flawed Service Nation report which proposes forced labour as part of the British way of life.
The rich middle class political elite such as Cameron have helped create an underclass, now out of control; he and others are desperate to find measures to manage it.
Cameron isn’t speaking of/or tackling the middle class social networks which are the real problem.
Demos are suggesting that good parenting was more important than wealth in determining life chances.
That as anyone who studies corrupt Britain knows is a lie.
In waving away the issue of poverty like a fly, Cameron said;
"Of course there's a link between material poverty and poor life chances, but the full picture is that that link also runs through the style of parenting that children in poor households receive."
In other words it is the fault of the uneducated poor but we should remember that life chances of the wealthy have one thing in common, wealth; this is the key that opens doors.
What Cameron and the Tories want has nothing to do about helping the poorest in society.
As I have said, not one word about the social networks that operates in places such as universities which ensure the rich middle class get priority over the poor.
Why do you think they operate a system of interviewing to get into medical schools?
It is to exclude.
Try solving that with ‘good parenting’ skills Cameron!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
No comments:
Post a Comment